HONOLULU (AP) — President Barack Obama on Tuesday designated the bulk of U.S.-owned waters in the Arctic Ocean and certain areas in the Atlantic Ocean as indefinitely off limits to future oil and gas leasing.
The move helps put some finishing touches on Obama’s environmental legacy while also testing President-elect Donald Trump’s promise to unleash the nation’s untapped energy reserves.
The White House announced the actions in conjunction with the government of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, which also placed a moratorium on new oil and gas leasing in its Arctic waters, subject to periodic review.
Obama is making use of an arcane provision in a 1953 law to ban offshore leases in the waters permanently. The statute says that “the president of the United States may, from time to time, withdraw from disposition any of the unleased lands of the outer Continental Shelf.”
Most Read Business Stories
- After an $800k yacht pileup in Ballard Locks, a fleet of lawyers arrives
- A $189 airport travel hack is no longer working very well
- Seattle-area mortgage payments cost nearly double the rent
- Don Bateman saved more lives than anyone in aviation history | Obituary VIEW
- Biden, GOP reach tentative deal to raise debt ceiling, avoid calamitous US default
Environmental groups hope the ban, despite relying on executive powers, will be difficult for future presidents to reverse. The White House said it’s confident the president’s order will withstand legal challenge and said the language of the statute provides no authority for subsequent presidents to undo permanent withdrawals.
The Atlantic waters placed off limits to new oil and gas leasing are 31 canyons stretching off the coast of New England south to Virginia, though some had hoped for a more extensive ban that would have extended further south.
Existing leases aren’t affected by the president’s executive actions.
The administration cited environmental concerns in both regions to justify the moratorium. Obama also cited the importance of the Chukchi and Beaufort seas in providing subsistence for native Alaskans and the vulnerability of the ecosystem to an oil spill to justify his directive.
Obama also noted the level of fuel production occurring in the Arctic. Obama said just 0.1 percent of offshore crude production came from the Arctic in 2015, and at current oil prices, significant production would not occur in future decades.
“That’s why looking forward, we must continue to focus on economic empowerment for Arctic communities beyond this one sector,” Obama said.
Still, industry officials objected to Obama’s memorandum, calling it “last minute political rhetoric.”
“Instead of building on our nation’s position as a global energy leader, today’s unilateral mandate could put America back on a path of energy dependence for decades to come,” said Dan Naatz of the Independent Petroleum Association of America.
And Alaska Gov. Bill Walker, an independent, said Obama’s move marginalized local voices. He said no one is more invested than Alaskans in making sure Arctic habitats are protected.
“To lock it up against any further exploration or development activity is akin to saying that the voices of activists who live in Lower 48 cities have a greater stake than those to whom the Arctic is our front yard and our back yard,” he said in a statement.
The permanent ban announced by Obama does not extend to leasing in near-shore Arctic waters where the state of Alaska has jurisdiction.
In October, Caelus Energy Alaska announced a “significant” oil discovery on state leases in the North Slope area of Smith Bay, with an estimated potential recovery of at least 1.8 billion barrels of crude.
In issuing the ban, Obama appears to be trying to tie the hands of his successor. Trump has vowed a domestic energy revolution and is filling his Cabinet with nominees deeply opposed to Obama’s environmental and climate-change actions.
Environmental groups were calling for a permanent ban even before the presidential election, but Trump’s victory has provided greater urgency for them and for businesses that rely on tourism and fishing. Trump has said he intends to use all available fuel reserves for energy self-sufficiency — and that it’s time to open up offshore drilling.
“This decision will help protect existing lucrative coastal tourism and fishing businesses from offshore drilling, which promises smaller, short-lived returns and threatens coastal livelihoods,” said Jacqueline Savitz, a senior vice president at the advocacy group, Oceana.
Seattle has served both as hub of protests and marine services for offshore exploration in the Arctic by Shell, which held a two-year lease to base vessels at Terminal 5.
In September 2015, after a summer of drilling in the Chukchi Sea, Shell announced it would end that exploration “for the foreseeable future,” citing the disappointing results of an initial well, the high costs of development and the “challenging and unpredictable federal regulatory environment in offshore Alaska.”
That was a blow to Seattle’s maritime industry, which stood to prosper from offshore exploration, but was viewed as a major victory by environmentalists seeking to stop offshore oil development that posed risks to wildlife and would contribute to climate change.
A key question to be answered is how difficult it will be for future presidents to overturn Obama’s decision should they seek to do so.
The American Petroleum Institute pointed to 2008 when President George W. Bush used a simple memorandum to remove previously withdrawn lands and make all Outer Continental Shelf lands available for leasing except marine sanctuaries.
“Fortunately, there is no such thing as a permanent ban,” said the institute’s Erik Milito.
But White House officials in a conference call with reporters said previous “indefinite withdrawals” remain in place and voiced confidence that Obama’s decision will stand.
Advocacy groups were already warning that they were prepared to file suit to protect the ban during future administrations.
“If Donald Trump tries to reverse President Obama’s withdrawals, he will find himself in court,” said Marissa Knodel of Friends of the Earth.
Frank Knapp, president of the South Carolina Small Business Chamber of Commerce in Columbia, said he was “extremely disappointed” in the decision not to extend drilling protections to the entire Atlantic seaboard.
Knapp and his group were among a number of business groups in the southeast who had advocated for banning new drilling leases off their shores, arguing that the environmental impacts would hurt fishing, tourism and other businesses the region relies upon. He’d gone to Washington to meet with Obama administration officials, and believed the entire Atlantic was to be protected.
The decision came as Obama spends the holidays in Hawaii. Some Democratic lawmakers applauded Obama, while some Republicans were highly critical.
“As President-elect Trump nominates fossil fuel allies to his Cabinet, President Obama has instead put the interests of millions of Americans ahead of those of Big Oil with these permanent protections,” said Democratic Sen. Ed Markey of Massachusetts.
“The extremes to which this president will go to appease special interests never ceases to amaze,” countered Rep. Rob Bishop, R-Utah, and chairman of the House Committee on Natural Resources. “This is not a moral calling; it’s an abuse of power.”
Associated Press writers Josh Lederman in Washington, Jason Dearen in Gainesville, Florida, and Becky Bohrer in Juneau, Alaska, contributed to this report.
On Twitter, reach Kevin Freking at https://twitter.com/APkfreking