Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Kevin Martin said Tuesday his agency has all the authority it needs to prevent Internet-service...
WASHINGTON — Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Kevin Martin said Tuesday his agency has all the authority it needs to prevent Internet-service providers from discriminating against Web surfers and that new legislation is unnecessary.
“I do not believe any additional regulations are needed at this time,” Martin said at a hearing before the Senate Commerce Committee. “But I also believe that the commission has a responsibility to enforce the principles that it has already adopted.”
The FCC has conducted two hearings on “network management” after admissions by Comcast that it sometimes delayed file-sharing traffic for subscribers as a way to keep Web traffic flowing.
Most Read Business Stories
- The penthouse atop Smith Tower is on the rental market for the first time
- Downtowns will be back, but Seattle has choices to make
- Boutique cruise line Windstar will move its Seattle headquarters to Miami
- Zillow’s price estimates are now cash offers in homebuying push
- FCC approves $50 monthly high-speed internet subsidy for low-income households
The hearing was called at a time when the issue of “network neutrality” — the principle that people should be able to go where they choose on the Internet without interference from network owners — has heated up.
The network-neutrality debate has divided Congress, with Democrats largely in favor and Republicans mostly opposed, a point that became clearer at Tuesday’s committee meeting.
“It is a political division now, and it’s getting more so,” said Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska. “It is unfortunate.” He said a return to “intense regulation” of the Internet is “entirely unwarranted.”
The hearing included some star power, with the appearance of Justine Bateman, best known for her role on the TV sitcom “Family Ties.” Bateman is a founding partner of a new online media venture.
“The idea of your site succeeding or failing based upon whether or not you paid the telecom companies enough to carry your material or allow quick access is appalling,” she told the committee.
Also speaking for a free-flowing Internet was Patric Verrone, president of the Writers Guild of America, West, which recently ended a 100-day strike that virtually paralyzed television production. The Internet was a valuable organizing tool for the writers, he said in an interview.
“When your employers are the same companies that control the media, it’s hard to get your message out,” Verrone said.
To maintain contact with one another, guild members used blog postings, e-mail and videos. The success of that campaign prompted Verrone to come to Washington, D.C., and push for legislation he hopes will guarantee the Internet’s status as an open forum for communication.
Verrone, a television writer and producer for more than 20 years, supports legislation proposed by Sens. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, and Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., that would force those who control Internet service to treat all traffic equally.
Large network owners, such as cable and telecommunications companies, oppose network-neutrality legislation. Kyle McSlarrow, president and CEO of the National Cable and Telecommunications Association, described the picture painted by those favoring net neutrality as “a complete fantasy.”
McSlarrow said of the tens of millions of people who use the Internet every day, “no one is being blocked” and if they were, they could go to another service provider.
Martin told the panel that the FCC’s anti-discrimination “Internet Policy Statement,” approved in 2005, is enforceable and gives the commission adequate authority to protect consumers.
However, when the policy was approved, Martin had a different opinion.
In his statement at the time, he noted “policy statements do not establish rules nor are they enforceable documents” but that the commission decision “does reflect core beliefs that each member of this commission holds regarding how broadband Internet access should function.”