WASHINGTON (AP) — After striking a delicate deal with the United Arab Emirates this month on rules for airline competition, the Trump administration went to war with itself.
It’s a story of how a wonky aviation pact became a bitter, lobbyist-fueled international incident when Peter Navarro, President Donald Trump’s trade adviser, repeatedly contradicted the State Department’s carefully crafted script about what the agreement actually said. The Emiratis complained to the administration.
The drama has played out as Navarro, a nationalist who has sought aggressive protections for U.S. businesses, seeks to assert authority from his perch at Trump’s recently created White House trade and manufacturing policy shop. Earlier in May, tensions between Navarro and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin over Navarro’s role in China trade talks erupted into a profanity-laced confrontation in Beijing, Bloomberg and the website Axios reported.
In the airlines dispute, the most explosive issue was so-called Fifth Freedom flights, by which Emirati airlines fly directly from the United States to places like Europe, never stopping in the UAE. The major U.S. airlines loathe such flights, which compete with their own lucrative routes.
Most Read Business Stories
- Largest e-recycling fraud in U.S. history sends owners of Kent firm to prison
- Amazon grabs large downtown Bellevue property next to transit hub
- Boeing CEO denies any ‘technical slip’ in 737 MAX crashes, as grounding cuts into profit and cash reserves
- Peek inside the Hunts Point mansion, famous for huge art collection, that sold for record $37.5 million WATCH
- Billionaires are worried about capitalism — they should look in a mirror | Jon Talton
Navarro has insisted that the deal includes a “freeze” in such flights. The State Department, which overseas international civil aviation agreements, insists it does not.
From the start, Navarro sought to exert influence over the negotiations, pushing for stricter limitations on Persian Gulf airlines, according to half a dozen U.S. officials and other individuals involved in the dispute. They weren’t authorized to discuss the issue publicly and requested anonymity.
After a similar deal with Qatar’s airline was reached earlier, Navarro intervened last-minute and demanded changes to the agreed-upon text, two of the individuals said. So concerned was the State Department that the deal would be scuttled that at one point Assistant Secretary of State Manisha Singh urged parties with a stake in the fight, such as the U.S. cargo airlines, to voice concerns about Navarro directly to the White House, other officials said.
Navarro disputed the notion he had undermined the State Department or created discord over the agreement.
“The White House worked collaboratively on this issue through the inter-agency process” with the State Department, Navarro said. A senior State Department official also said the effort had been “collaborative” and geared toward achieving “a positive result for as many U.S. stakeholders as possible.”
But behind the scenes, the dispute devolved into one-upmanship, word games and subtle subterfuge, magnified by hard-hitting lobby groups that have seized the chance to exploit divisions within Trump’s administration.
The deal with the Emiratis was reached May 11 after months of negotiations. The agreement itself glossed over Fifth Freedom flights, which were instead resolved in a “side letter” from the Emiratis. In the letter, obtained by The Associated Press, the Emirati economic minister says both of his country’s airlines “voluntarily” informed the UAE that they had “no current plans in place to make any changes” to the routes. There is no talk of a freeze or commitment not to change those plans in the future.
By design, the letter was to be kept private, allowing both sides to save face by staying intentionally vague about its contents. But within hours, both the U.S. airlines and the Emiratis rushed to define the agreement on their terms.
The Partnership for Open & Fair Skies — a lobby group for Delta Air Lines, American Airlines and United Airlines — said the agreement “will freeze Emirates and Etihad Airways from adding additional direct flights from the United States to Europe and Asia.” An hour later, Emirati Ambassador Yousef al-Otaiba said the opposite, insisting his country’s airlines were “free to continue to add and adjust routes and services.”
Anticipating that scenario, the State Department had circulated talking points ahead of time to be used by government spokesmen if asked whether the deal included a freeze.
“No,” said the talking points, which were obtained by the AP.
But then Singh and Navarro hosted a conference call to brief industry lobbyists about the deal, and the situation deteriorated.
Navarro brought up Otaiba’s comments and said they “seemed to undermine the intent of the letter.” Singh replied with a non-answer, saying the letter speaks for itself. So Navarro jumped back in, asserting that there will be no additional routes until further notice and adding, “that’s a promise that will be kept.”
A lobbyist for the U.S. Travel Association, funded by the Emirati airlines and others who oppose the U.S. airlines on this issue, asked repeatedly for clarity. Singh said there was no freeze and that the rights to add flights “do not change. That is correct.”
Navarro said the opposite, declaring there was “a freeze on routes until further notice. So there it is.”
By longstanding practice, such briefings are generally considered private and off the record. The Partnership for Open & Fair Skies immediately posted a partial transcript of the call on its website and promoted it on social media with paid ads and a photo of Navarro. The White House was incensed, one official said.
A few days later, the transcript was quietly pulled down from the Partnership’s website. The AP preserved a screenshot from the original post.
The Emiratis, meanwhile, protested to the administration, insisting the mess be fixed. And so began the battle of the written statements.
A State Department notice pointed out that “all rights” to adjust routes remain in place, calling the agreement the “result of the Department of State-led effort.” Three days later, a White House statement stuck to the “no current plans” language, but downgraded the State Department’s role, saying the deal resulted from “a White House task force.” The next day, the State Department released the full text of the agreement — but not the side letter addressing the flights issue.
At the last minute, Navarro was added as a speaker to an event held Monday at the conservative Hudson Institute. State Department officials called around to groups aligned with the Emirati position and encouraged them to show up and ask questions that would force Navarro to clean up his past statements, three individuals familiar with the calls said.
Just as Navarro took the stage, an op-ed under his name appeared online in the Washington Examiner in which he reverted to the State Department talking points about “no current plans,” while avoiding any mention of a freeze. For his remarks at the event, he read his op-ed word for word.
Americans for Fair Skies, a lobby group formed by Delta, paid part of the cost of the event, the Hudson Institute said.
Reach Josh Lederman on Twitter at http://twitter.com/joshledermanAP