Education Secretary Betsy DeVos was not on the ballot in the Michigan governor’s race, but her legacy loomed over the campaign in her home state, which has the country’s highest concentration of for-profit charter schools.
Republican Bill Schuette, a DeVos ally and the state’s attorney general, ultimately lost to Gretchen Whitmer, a Democrat and former state lawmaker who pledged on the campaign trail to “put an end to the DeVos agenda.” She has promised to stop new for-profit schools from opening and to demand more accountability from charter schools.
Michigan was one of several key states that elected new governors who are more skeptical of charter schools than their election opponents, and will replace leaders who openly supported the sector that enrolls roughly 3 million students across the U.S. in schools that are publicly funded but privately run.
The states that saw such reversals — including California, Illinois and Michigan — are home to some of the strongest charter school enrollment numbers, and the outcomes suggest the political landscape could be growing more difficult for future expansion, particularly under Democratic leadership. The winners pledged support for traditional public schools while campaigning in the shadow of a teacher protest movement that forced a national conversation about the state of public education.
Most Read Business Stories
- As body cameras gain more attention, their uses are expanding well beyond law enforcement
- American Air to book jets to capacity, shelve social distancing
- Tapping funds when you're home-equity rich but cash poor
- We've been isolated for months, and now we hate our home assistants
- Five things to make part of your new financial normal
As Democrats flipped seven governor seats to bolster their numbers to 23 across the country, the incoming governors in California, Illinois and New Mexico have all said they want to take the rare step of putting a temporary halt on new charter schools. New governors in Connecticut, Kansas, Maine and Nevada also are expressing less enthusiasm for charters than their predecessors.
Jon Valant, an education policy expert at the Brookings Institution think tank, said certain Democrats see opposing school choice initiatives as a way to resist DeVos and President Donald Trump. While existing charter schools won’t be touched, Valant said he expects overall growth to stall and for-profit schools to be in peril.
“There’s not a ton of optimism for charters and choice. I think there’s a cultural and political shift on what charters are that actually presents a more fundamental problem,” Valant said.
The first charter school opened nearly three decades ago and, with an emphasis on innovation, achieved steady growth and the ultimate Democratic seal of approval from President Barack Obama, who publicly supported “good” charter schools.
But more recently, some liberals have soured on charter schools, emphasizing instead investment in traditional public schools that educate the vast majority of America’s children. That’s in contrast to the Trump administration and DeVos, a billionaire philanthropist who has long been influential in pushing school choice policies in Michigan and across the U.S. Republicans, who control 27 governor seats, are largely united in their support for charter schools.
Politico reported in October that DeVos was mentioned in Democratic campaign messaging for 2018 races more than 6,200 times all across the country.
In California, the resistance against DeVos also was evident in the most expensive state superintendent race in U.S. history, in which Marshall Tuck, who previously led a charter school network, lost to union-backed state Assemblyman Tony Thurmond, a fellow Democrat. Tuck couldn’t overcome the negative ads that tied him to DeVos’ zeal for school choice, despite garnering record-breaking campaign support from pro-charter philanthropists.
California Gov.-elect Gavin Newsom, who has long allied himself with the state teachers unions, has called for a temporary halt on charter school openings to consider the schooling model’s overall transparency issues.
Charters are not subject to the same rules or standards governing traditional public schools but are embraced by many advocates who see them as investments in better and different ways to educate those who struggle in traditional systems, particularly children in poor, urban areas. Teachers unions are among the critics who reject charters as drains on cash-starved public schools. Studies on academic success are mixed.
Todd Ziebarth, a senior vice president of the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools, said the road ahead could be especially bumpy in Michigan, Illinois and California, though he’s skeptical of how aggressive those new governors will be on delivering their campaign promises. A broad, statewide moratorium on charter school growth would be unprecedented, Ziebarth said.
Charter advocates also pointed to the pro-charter Democratic governors who were re-elected in New York and Rhode Island, while Jared Polis, a charter school founder, won handedly in Colorado.
Shavar Jeffries, president of Democrats for Education Reform, rejected the notion that his pro-charter reform group is fighting an uphill battle among progressives.
“There’s an ongoing fight within the party, as there has been for 20 years,” Jeffries said. “We win some, we lose some.”
Follow AP Education Reporter Sally Ho on Twitter: https://twitter.com/_SallyHo