Federal investigators have subpoenaed Diego Pellicer Worldwide, a newly public company whose marijuana-related business barely exists. Also, Starbucks rises to No. 2 in U.S. restaurant sales, topping Subway.
The Top 5 Things You Don’t Want to Say when introducing a new public company might be:
No. 5. We’ve received a subpoena from the U.S. Attorney.
No. 4. We’ve only got one real paying customer.
No. 3. We’re not sure when we can actually collect any money from that customer.
Most Read Business Stories
- Netflix raising prices for 58M US subscribers as costs rise
- Macy's will close its Northgate store next year, Redmond store in next few months
- Alaska Air to add thousands of jobs in 2019
- Most Googled tech questions state-by-state
- Seattle still has the most cranes in America, and construction isn't losing much steam
No. 2. We’re lending money to keep that customer running.
No. 1. We’re not sure what the U.S. Attorney wants, but in the worst-case scenario, our officers could be imprisoned and our investors hosed.
Diego Pellicer Worldwide, the company that says it’s “developing the world’s first ‘premium’ marijuana brand,” acknowledged those issues last week deep in its first regulatory filing after merging into a public shell company.
The Diego Pellicer name may be familiar because co-founder Jamen Shively got plenty of publicity, here in hometown Seattle and elsewhere, with a lot of grandiose declarations a couple years ago. “We are Big Marijuana,” he told one news conference, though he offered nothing to back it up. Shively even got former Mexican President Vicente Fox to show up for an event touting the company’s plans.
But Shively, who named the company after his great-great-grandfather, is no longer visible, and cultivating quality weed is not Diego Pellicer Worldwide’s modus operandi at this point.
The company says it is essentially a landlord for marijuana businesses until the federal legal issues around actually working with pot are resolved. It has leased properties in Seattle and Denver.
Yet it insists the brand name will somehow prove magical: “Diego Pellicer is to marijuana what Davidoff is to cigars, Godiva to chocolate and Starbucks to coffee,” declares its filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Marijuana mania in small, speculative stocks has come down from its 2013-2014 high. “Buzzkill: Marijuana Stock Frenzy Looks Like It’s Totally Crashed,” was a headline last month on TheStreet.com.
And other companies have taken the same approach as Diego Pellicer: Not selling or growing marijuana, just renting facilities to the growers.
The litany of problems in Diego Pellicer’s filing does make it a standout, however.
The company says that last year it leased three properties in Colorado and one in Washington. It found an “appropriate” tenant for the Colorado properties but — oops — “this tenant was also in a development stage of operations and could not conduct operations until they received the proper licenses from the state.”
So Diego Pellicer booked $497,000 in revenue for that customer, but took a $497,000 reserve in case it can’t ever collect that rent. Landlord Diego Pellicer is also loaning the tenant money so it will develop the properties “to grow, process and sell their products” — and also has agreed to “underwrite the rental cost” until the tenant business becomes operational, possibly early this summer.
Not mentioned in the filing is why those three properties were available for Diego Pellicer to lease last summer: All three were raided by the Drug Enforcement Agency, which shut down the medical-marijuana dispensary that used the locations to grow and sell its products, according to reports at the time in The Denver Post. That has nothing to do with Diego Pellicer but underscores the volatile and uncertain state of the marijuana business.
In Seattle, the company’s only property — described in the regulatory filing as a 4,500-square-foot “flagship recreational MJ store w/cafe and apparel” — is a single-story building on Fourth Avenue South that appears empty and mostly unused, with its windows papered over and an old sign out front still advertising “Keystone Windows and Doors.”
A year ago it leased the property to Diego Pellicer Inc., a separate but affiliated company that intends to sell marijuana — if it ever gets a state license.
As for the subpoena: A spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Seattle wouldn’t comment. Diego Pellicer’s filing, however, says the May 23, 2014, subpoena demanded, among other things, its banking records; documents relating to communications with potential investors; and the application by Diego Pellicer Inc. to become a marijuana retailer licensed by the Washington State Liquor Control board.
The SEC filing says that “based on limited discussions with the Department of Justice,” the feds are looking at whether the company produced or sold marijuana, and “whether investors or potential investors in the company believed they were investing in a company that would be engaged in the production, processing or sale of cannabis.”
The company believes it hasn’t broken any laws and is cooperating with the investigation, says the filing.
But it also warns that “depending on the extent to which the Department of Justice pursues this matter, the company may be required to suspend or cease its operations, which could lead to the possible loss of investors’ entire investment in the company.”
If company executives were found to have committed unlawful acts, they could be barred from the company or even incarcerated, the filing notes.
Despite putting out a media release announcing completion of the shell-company merger, company officials declined to be interviewed or to answer questions about its business.
Its current CEO is identified as Philip Gay, who held top management roles at food chains such as California Pizza Kitchen and Wolfgang Puck Food.
The stock is not yet actually trading; it’s expected initially to trade in the lowest tier of the over the counter market.
— Rami Grunbaum: email@example.com
Starbucks rises in restaurant sales
Starbucks has now surpassed Subway as the second-largest U.S. restaurant chain in terms of sales after McDonald’s, as American consumers increasingly trade fast food’s traditional convenience for things that look a little more upscale.
According to a report by Technomic, a widely followed food retail consultancy. Starbucks’ U.S. sales reached $12.7 billion in 2014, up 8.2 percent, while Subway’s fell 3.3 percent to about $11.9 billion.
Although a latte can be as expensive as a sandwich, the shift is mostly due to changing consumer tastes.
“Even if they’re in a rush, consumers want something that has a little better quality — something they feel better about eating, and where they feel better in the store,” says Mary Chapman, Technomic’s senior director of product innovation.
It’s the same trend that has propelled so-called fast casual places like Chipotle and fancy burger and pizza places, Chapman added.
Starbucks now sees itself as a food destination, not merely a coffee merchant: it plans to double its food revenue to $4 billion in 2019 by selling everything from breakfast to snacks to dinner tapas.
Nevertheless, the Green Mermaid’s apotheosis is not complete: Starbucks would have to nearly triple its U.S. revenue to dethrone McDonald’s, whose old-school fast-food offerings yielded $35.4 billion in domestic sales.
The sun seems to be slowly setting on the empire of the Golden Arches, however: Technomic says its sales fell 1.1 percent from 2013.
Ángel González firstname.lastname@example.org
|The top 10 restaurant chains, by U.S. revenues:|
|Burger King||$8.6 billion|
|Taco Bell||$8.2 billion|
|Dunkin’ Donuts||$7.2 billion|
|Pizza Hut||$5.65 billion|