The ruling is a blow to Republican efforts to rein in public-sector labor unions, which some states have aggressively curtailed in recent years.
A federal district judge in Washington struck down most of the key provisions of three executive orders that President Donald Trump signed in late May that would have made it easier to fire federal employees.
The ruling, issued early Saturday, is a blow to Republican efforts to rein in public-sector labor unions, which states like Wisconsin have aggressively curtailed in recent years. In June, the Supreme Court dealt public-sector unions a major blow by ending mandatory union fees for government workers nationwide. (Federal workers were already exempt from paying such fees.)
Amid these setbacks, the fight against Trump’s executive orders has taken on an added urgency among many public-sector union leaders.
“We are very pleased that the court agreed that the president far exceeded his authority, and that the apolitical career federal work force shall be protected from these illegal, politically motivated executive orders,” Sarah Suszczyk, the co-chair of a coalition of government-workers unions, said in a statement.
Most Read Business Stories
- Two-pizza teams and more: Former Amazon employees bake Bezos principles into their startups
- Boeing's fix tames the 'tiger' in the 737 MAX flight controls, say experts and critics
- NTSB recommends Boeing redesign and retrofit engine casing on thousands of 737s
- Boeing abandons its failed fuselage robots on the 777X, handing the job back to machinists WATCH
- Ford introduces all-electric Mustang
The executive orders, which also rolled back the power of the unions that represent federal workers, had instructed agencies to seek to reduce the amount of time in which underperforming employees are allowed to demonstrate improvement before facing termination, from a maximum of up to 120 days to a maximum of 30 days, and to seek to limit workers’ avenues for appealing performance evaluations. The orders also sought to significantly reduce the amount of so-called official time that federal employees in union positions can spend on union business during work-hours.
In their legal complaint, the unions argued that the executive orders were illegal because federal law requires these rules to be negotiated between government agencies and the unions that represent their workers.
The complaint said that the president lacks the authority to override federal law on these questions, and the judge in the case, Ketanji Brown Jackson, agreed, writing that most of the key provisions of the executive orders “conflict with congressional intent in a manner that cannot be sustained.”
The Trump administration will most likely appeal the decision to a federal circuit court, and could then appeal to the Supreme Court if it loses there. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.