Q: According to its Web site, the Vanguard Long Term Treasury fund started in 1986 and has averaged an annual return of 8. 83 percent since inception...
Q: According to its Web site, the Vanguard Long Term Treasury fund started in 1986 and has averaged an annual return of 8.83 percent since inception. Am I misunderstanding something? How can the returns be more than Treasuries have been yielding for the past several years?
Is there a risk in this fund if it invests only in U.S. Treasuries? This seems to be one of those “too good to be true” deals. I can’t help feel that I am misunderstanding something.
— J.S., Dallas
A: You are misunderstanding something, and you have lots of company. Equally important, this isn’t unique to the Vanguard Long Term Treasury fund — most funds that invest in long-term government bonds have provided handsome total returns over the past 10 to 20 years.
Most Read Stories
- Seattle’s income tax on the wealthy is illegal, judge rules
- Analysis: Five reasons the Seahawks waived Dwight Freeney WATCH
- 'I just can’t take these night games': Husky football fans tired of late games, with little notice
- 2 shot at Capitol Hill nightclub in Seattle
- Jobs that pay without a B.A.: the most lucrative fields in Washington state
The average return of 89 long-term government bond funds over the 12 months ending June 30, for instance, was 11.82 percent (data from Morningstar). The same figures for the past three, five, 10 and 15 years, respectively, were 9.94 percent, 9.44 percent, 7.50 percent and 9.19 percent.
There is a simple explanation for this. According to the Treasury constant maturity index history available on the Dallas Federal Reserve Bank Web site (www.dallasfed.org/data/data/rmgnb20m.tab.htm), the highest yield on a 20-year Treasury bond was 15.13 percent in October 1981. The peak average yield for a year was 13.72 percent in the same year. Many have forgotten the staggering interest rates of the late ’70s and early ’80s.
Since then, bond yields have declined. On 20-year Treasuries, yields averaged 10.97 percent in 1985, 7.85 percent in 1986, and continued a slow decline. The low yield on a 20-year Treasury was 4.34 percent in June 2003. The current yield is about 4.60 percent.
Now ask yourself a question. Someone is offering you two bonds with a face value of $1,000. One pays interest at 12 percent and will give you two payments a year of $60. The other pays interest at 4 percent and will give you two payments a year of $20. Otherwise, the two bonds are absolutely equal.
Which bond would you rather own?
It doesn’t take an MBA to know that you’d be better off buying the bond that pays $120 a year. Indeed, investors will pay quite a bit more for a bond that pays $120 a year than for a bond that pays $40 a year.
When a mutual fund that invests in long-term bonds lists its annual return or its average return, it is the total return of the fund. The total return is the combination of the interest income received plus (or minus) the change in value of the portfolio.
When interest rates decline, a portfolio of bonds that pay $120 a year will rise in value relative to bonds that pay less.
So the total return of the fund will rise because the bonds could be sold for more than their original purchase price.
Part of the total return provided by long-term bond funds in the past 20 years has been capital gains.
Bond-fund owners probably won’t enjoy such high returns in the future. With interest rates below 5 percent, there isn’t nearly as much room for decline. It would take a continued decline in interest rates to provide those 8 percent returns for a few more years.
Bond investors should be worrying about the other side of the coin — the loss in market value when today’s 4.6 percent coupon Treasury bonds, which pay $46 a year, will have to compete with newly issued bonds that may pay $50 and $55 a year because they have coupons of 5 percent and 5.5 percent.
When interest rates rose in 1999, for instance, the average long-term government bond fund lost 8.23 percent, despite its interest income.
While interest rates could decline still further, the odds now favor flat to rising interest rates.
Questions about personal finance and investments may be sent to Scott Burns at The Dallas Morning News, P.O. Box 655237, Dallas, TX 75265; by fax at 214-977-8776; or by e-mail at email@example.com. Questions of general interest will be answered in future columns.