In his two years as the FCC’s general counsel, Jonathan Sallet, 63, has taken center stage in some of the most divisive debates in Washington.
WASHINGTON — Every day for one month last fall, Jonathan Sallet, the general counsel at the Federal Communications Commission, sneaked into a small, windowless office at the agency, its location undisclosed except to senior staff.
From 6 a.m. until early evening, with Bach streaming in the background, he worked mostly alone, marking up stacks of law books and standing in front of a lectern. His job: Defend in court the FCC’s most contentious policy: rules to classify broadband Internet providers as utilities, widely called net neutrality.
“I did nothing for one month but prepare,” Sallet said in an interview. “I talked a lot to the wall.”
His arguments, though — like nearly all of his actions for the agency — have had far-reaching reverberations.
Most Read Stories
- Seattle-area rents drop significantly for first time this decade as new apartments sit empty
- Seahawks bringing back Ken Norton Jr. as defensive coordinator
- Washington state will require court order to release driver’s license info to immigration authorities
- Seahawks hire veteran Mike Solari as offensive-line coach to replace Tom Cable
- Overbilled and overstressed: 3 Seattle City Light customers vent
In his two years as the FCC’s general counsel, Sallet, 63, has taken center stage in some of the most divisive debates in Washington, D.C. He helped shape and then defend the net-neutrality law. His input helped kill the Comcast-Time Warner Cable merger last year. In recent days, the cable industry has closely tracked his thinking about a merger between Charter and Time Warner Cable, concerned about a similar result.
“Typically a general counsel is like an administrator,” said Reed Hundt, a former Democratic chairman of the FCC. “But in Jon you have an administrator who is also a policy maven and political strategist.”
Sallet will draw more of the spotlight in coming months, a period that could shape the tech and cable landscape for years to come. The agency is set to take a position on the Charter and Time Warner Cable deal, as well as vote to open the market of set-top cable boxes to new competitors. And the decision in the net-neutrality case, the one he prepared so long and hard for, is also expected.
Each weekday morning, Sallet is among a small cadre of top advisers who meet at 8:45 to discuss policy and strategy with Tom Wheeler, the chairman of the FCC. Wheeler, a former lobbyist for the cable and wireless industries, knows firsthand how the agency’s actions can be derailed by the pressure of lobbying by the powerful businesses he used to represent.
“He is a multifaceted talent with the ability to see all angles of an issue and provide sage counsel,” Wheeler said of Sallet.
In the recent interview in his office, where the slim and soft-spoken Sallet keeps a keyboard and guitar, he said swift changes in how people communicate and consume media have thrust the agency — and him — into the spotlight.
For decades, Sallet has been an inside player in telecom policies. After graduating from law school at the University of Virginia and working as a clerk for Supreme Court Justice Lewis F. Powell, he spent 30 years representing companies like MCI and working on tech policy at the Commerce Department.
While at the Commerce Department, he was introduced to the Mosaic Web browser by Vice President Al Gore. That was in 1993, the same year Wheeler showed him a demonstration of a wireless phone.
These days, Sallet said, policies related to smartphones and the Internet get such strong reactions that they require more than a broad view of economics and markets. They also require an ability to navigate pointed political criticism.
That climate makes sticking to a set of principles all the more important, he said. For him, those ideas are that networks should be open for consumers and that the FCC should “take actions to avoid a society of haves and have-nots.”
Net neutrality “involves competition issues; the mergers are quite clearly about competition,” he said.
The harshest criticisms have been for Sallet’s role in advising and writing up net-neutrality policy — with technology and telecom companies arguing that Sallet, a Democrat, has made too many decisions based on politics.
In October 2014, Wheeler, also a Democrat, introduced rules that could have let cable and telecom firms carve the Internet into various high-quality and low-quality tiers, according to some legal experts and net-neutrality advocates. Top officials at the agency were reluctant to create stronger rules that ban such practices by regulating Internet service providers like utilities.
Sallet had talked in public about a desire for a middle ground “hybrid” rule that prevented broadband providers from blocking or unfairly slowing down traffic but did not expand the agency’s regulation over the industry. That middle ground was quickly attacked by many net-neutrality advocates, drawing millions of comments of protest, many of them inspired by a late-night monologue by the comedian John Oliver.
The pressure intensified the next month, when President Obama took the unusual step of saying that broadband service providers should be treated like utilities, subject to rules akin to those placed on phone services. Soon after, Wheeler directed Sallet to rewrite the draft rules to more aggressively regulate the Internet service providers.
“Ultimately Jon is the lawyer and Wheeler is his client,” said Robert D. Atkinson, president of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation.