Ernst & Young has stood by its auditing decisions, arguing that no one could have detected Madoff’s sophisticated fraud.

Share story

Ernst & Young’s failure to vet financial audits backed by con man Bernie Madoff’s accountant may cost the consulting firm $25 million based on the verdict in the first trial of an auditor over losses tied to the biggest Ponzi scheme in U.S. history.

FutureSelect Portfolio Management, which sued Ernst & Young in 2010 over faulty audits of a Madoff-linked feeder fund, is entitled to recoup a portion of the $112 million it lost in its investment in the fund, jurors in Seattle state court ruled Friday.

The jury found Ernst & Young liable for half of the $20.3 million in damages it awarded. With interest added, the firm is on the hook for about $25 million, a FutureSelect lawyer said.

While negligence cases against Big Four accounting firms are rare, this one was brought under a Washington state securities law that is more protective of investors than similar state and federal statutes. In the end, the jury issued mixed findings on the state securities claims while ruling in FutureSelect’s favor on Ernst & Young’s negligent misrepresentation.

Amy Call Well, a spokeswoman for Ernst & Young, said the firm is pleased the jury rejected the “vast majority” of FutureSelect’s claims. She said Ernst & Young is considering whether to appeal.

Ernst & Young audited Rye Funds, which was managed by Tremont Group Holdings. The accounting firm audited Rye from 2000 to 2003 and performed surprise audits of Tremont during that period until 2008, FutureSelect said in court documents.

The company sued Ernst & Young along with Tremont and its parent Oppenheimer Acquisition, which later reached confidential settlements.

FutureSelect accused the accounting firm of failing to perform adequate audit procedures to test the existence of assets on Rye’s financial statements. Instead, it relied on assurances made by Madoff to whom Rye had outsourced everything from investment decisions to record keeping.

Ernst & Young was accused of relying on audit reports done by Madoff’s accounting firm Friehling & Horowitz. Ernst & Young failed to inquire about Friehling & Horowitz’s professional reputation, Steven Thomas, an attorney for FutureSelect, said in closing arguments. Had it done so it would have found out that the accountant wasn’t vetted to do audits as required by industry standards, Thomas said.

FutureSelect attorney Thomas called the jury decision “a significant victory for the public. … auditors like Ernst & Young are the gatekeepers between investors and people who commit fraud.”

Ernst & Young said that it wasn’t responsibile for any ot the investor losses. The firm “was not the auditor of any Madoff entity; we were among the many auditors of funds that chose to use Madoff as their investment adviser. While we regret the investors’ losses, no audit of a Madoff-advised fund could have detected this Ponzi scheme,” Call Well said in an e-mailed statement.

Tremont was the second-biggest feeder into Madoff’s multibillion-dollar fraud. Tremont and the liquidator of Madoff’s brokerage agreed in 2013 to a $1 billion settlement, freeing up money to repay some investors. FutureSelect, based in Redmond, opted out of that deal and pursued its own case.

Madoff is serving a 150-year prison term for stealing billions of dollars from thousands of investors.