What's at stake is more than an individual trade dispute. Please vote, and stay for the top economics links and haiku.

Share story

Earlier this week, the U.S. Commerce Department announced a jaw-dropping 219 percent tariff on the new commercial airliner from Canada’s Bombardier, concluding it had received unfair government subsidies from the Canadian and British governments. Complainant Boeing had asked for a 79 percent levy.

More tariffs could come next month when the department rules on whether the deal Bombardier gave Delta Air Lines is price dumping. The case involves Delta’s purchase of the Canadian company’s CSeries airliners.

Usually these cases go on for years before the World Trade Organization. But this is the most vigorous application of President Trump’s economic nationalism. In practice, it could make the CSeries unaffordable for U.S. carriers. Canada has already retaliated, putting a $5.2 billion Boeing defense contract on hold. My colleague Dominic Gates spoke to analysts who said the ruling could badly backfire. Not only could Boeing lose overseas business, but other countries could use the new American example to effectively block other U.S. exports.

All might be smoothed over in the end. But given this state of play, what do you think?

Most Read Stories

Unlimited Digital Access. $1 for 4 weeks.

——————————

This Week’s Links:

Boeing seeks protection in the guise of fairness | Financial Times

Portland in transition | Josh Lehner

UW named No. 7 among most innovative universities | Reuters

Thirteen facts about wage growth | The Hamilton Project

Real tax reform: What it is and what it isn’t | Jared Bernstein

Persistent employment disparities matter for the economy’s health | Lael Brainard

The fall, rise and fall of creative destruction | Justin Fox

——————————

Today’s Econ Haiku:

New media game

Keeping up with the Jones Act

Suffering’s inland

——————————