A surprising number of companies have given the same response when asked how they’ll use their corporate income-tax windfalls — one-time $1,000 bonuses for employees.
Dozens of large companies have announced the results of their tax-cut number crunching, and many of them have oddly arrived at the same conclusion: $1,000.
Consider Alaska Air Group. The Seattle company could save as much as $135 million next year from the change in the tax law, which reduced the corporate income tax rate to 21 percent from 35 percent, based on the fact that the airline has paid an average of 30 percent over the past three years. As a result, in early January, the airline company said that it was paying its employees a $1,000 bonus.
Home-improvement store chain Lowe’s, on the other hand, by the same math (neither company has fully detailed their expected tax savings) could save more than $700 million a year from the tax change. Last week, it became one of the latest large companies to announce what it would do with its savings: Pay its employees a — you guessed it — one-time $1,000 bonus.
Lowe’s has 290,000 employees, and Alaska Air has 22,000, so the cost of their bonuses will be different. But still, the similarity is odd given that their tax math is most likely vastly different, particularly given how similar it is to what other companies have been announcing.
Most Read Business Stories
- Truck drivers for Seattle sandwich maker Homegrown asked for a raise, then came the cameras
- Gravity Payments CEO Dan Price resigns
- Bill Gates and the secret push to save Biden’s climate bill
- What car buyers should know about the coming tax credits for EVs
- Pioneer Square security guard hopes you'll return to the office
Of the 51 companies in the S&P 500 that had detailed through Thursday how they would spend their tax windfall, 23 announced $1,000 one-time bonuses. Just four said they would hire more workers.
It’s not clear why $1,000 became the going rate. Some observers have pointed to Gary Cohn. In trying to sell the tax cut in late September, Cohn, one of the president’s chief economic advisers, said that an average American family could expect to see additional income of $1,000 from the president’s tax plan. He was mocked for saying that they could use the money to “renovate their kitchen, or buy a new car.”
Cohn appears to have been talking about tax savings, not wage increases. Nonetheless, companies could be rushing in to fill the void, effectively proving the administration correct and winning points with President Donald Trump at the White House’s preset price.
Another answer could be that companies are paying bonuses because they are worried that if they don’t they may lose employees to others that do. If that’s the case, the similar bonuses could be signaling that the labor market is a lot tighter than many think it is, or perhaps more monopolistic than we like to admit.
But the companies announcing the bonuses range from banks to retailers to railroads. Those companies most likely pay different wages to start with and require different skill sets from their employees. Still, Home Depot, Lowe’s and Walmart, all $1,000 bonus payers, may have reason for concern.
Perhaps the best answer is a giant case of what economists call anchoring.
In mid-December, just days after the tax law was passed, AT&T became the first big company out of the gate with its tax plans, which was a one-time $1,000 bonus to 200,000 employees. Despite the added cost, AT&T’s shares rose that day and the next, which may have signaled that $1,000 was the sweet spot for employees and investors.
And so other companies, either consciously or not, followed suit, even though the total cost of those bonuses would be different and most likely don’t reflect the actual impact of the tax law.
Then again, maybe $1,000 just rolls trippingly off the tongue and into Trump’s good graces.