WASHINGTON — The Trump administration on Wednesday made public the federal government’s first proposal to control planet-warming pollution from airplanes, but the draft regulation would not push the airlines beyond emissions limits they have set for themselves.
President Donald Trump is still pressing forward on his 3 1/2-year rollback of environmental standards, and the proposed airline rule would stave off an impending lawsuit by putting the federal government in compliance with a legal requirement that it regulate airplane greenhouse emissions.
“This is the third time in the past two years that this administration has taken major action to regulate greenhouse gases in a way that is legally defensible, reduces CO2 and protects American jobs,” Andrew Wheeler, the head of the Environmental Protection Agency, said on a telephone call with reporters Wednesday.
Wheeler said he was referring to a 2019 regulation on greenhouse emissions from power plants and an April rule governing emissions from vehicle tailpipes. Both of those rules replaced far more stringent climate change standards developed by the Obama administration, and in both cases the new rules allow for more planet-warming emissions than their predecessors.
The airline rules would be similar; critics say the substance of the proposal does little more than codify a set of standards largely created by the aviation industry itself and is unlikely to diminish the industry’s contribution to global warming.
The new proposal on airplane emissions, which would be open to public comment before being legally finalized, is modeled after a plan drafted largely by international airline companies and adopted in 2016 by the International Civil Aviation Organization, a United Nations body. That plan required a 4% reduction in fuel consumption of new aircraft starting in 2028 compared with 2015 deliveries.
“The loud and clear message I heard from the airline industry was to implement” that standard, Wheeler said.
Airline manufacturers praised the rule. Bryan Watt, a spokesperson for Boeing, called the new rule “a major step forward for protecting the environment and supporting sustainable growth of commercial aviation and the United States economy.”
Environmentalists have long said aviation emissions need to be reduced to prevent the worst effects of global warming. Air travel accounts for about 2.5% of global carbon dioxide emissions, a far smaller share than emissions from passenger cars or power plants. But those emissions are projected to triple by 2050, according to the International Civil Aviation Organization.
Analysts and environmentalists said neither the existing U.N. standard nor its formal adoption by the United States would do anything to lower aviation emissions because the airline industry met that standard years ago.
“Those standards are just a joke,” said Clare Lakewood, an attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity, an advocacy group. “They don’t require any meaningful emissions reductions.”
Daniel Rutherford, program director for aviation with the International Council on Clean Transportation, said the standard would not require any new investment in fuel-efficient technology. According to an upcoming analysis by Rutherford’s group, new aircraft had met the 2028 standard by 2016.
The future of the proposal will be determined by the results of the November election. It is unlikely the rule will be finalized before the end of this year, and former Vice President Joe Biden has campaigned on a platform of aggressive climate action. If he wins the presidency, his administration would most likely ignore the Trump proposal and write a new, more stringent one.
The Trump administration’s adoption of the aviation pollution standard appears timed to avoid a lawsuit that would compel it to begin regulating airplane emissions.
Because aircraft manufacturers around the world must demonstrate they are in compliance with the U.N. standard, airlines in the United States had asked the Trump administration to enact a domestic version of that standard. That way, companies could continue to sell American-made planes abroad.
Last year, Nancy Young, the vice president for environmental affairs at Airlines for America, a group that lobbies for the airline industry, testified to Congress her members needed the federal government to create a legal certification demonstrating American-made aircraft comply with the international standard.
“If U.S. aircraft manufacturers cannot have their products certified to the internationally agreed standards, U.S. airlines will not be able to purchase these aircraft for international service,” she said.
In 2016, the Obama administration released a legal conclusion known as an “endangerment finding,” which determined the planet-warming pollution produced by airplanes endangers human health by contributing to climate change. The endangerment finding did not include the details of a regulation, but it set off a legal requirement under the Clean Air Act for the EPA to establish a rule.
In January, several environmental groups filed a legal notice of their intent to sue the Trump administration for its failure to meet that requirement, giving 180 days’ notice. That notice expires Tuesday, but with the release of the draft rule, the environmental groups no longer have grounds to sue the administration to release a regulation on aviation pollution.