U.S. politicians are already protesting Belgian brewer InBev's unsolicited $46 billion bid to buy Anheuser-Busch and absorb the iconic...
ST. LOUIS — U.S. politicians are already protesting Belgian brewer InBev’s unsolicited $46 billion bid to buy Anheuser-Busch and absorb the iconic brewery to create the world’s fourth-largest consumer-products company. But it appears lawmakers have little leverage to stop the deal, which might ultimately be approved on antitrust grounds.
“It’s going to cause a lot of the angst and hand-wringing,” said Douglas Cogen, a mergers and acquisitions attorney with Fenwick & West in San Francisco. “In the end, there isn’t a lot of regulatory clearance that this deal needs.”
There are signs Anheuser-Busch is trying to thwart the deal. The Wall Street Journal reported Thursday the brewer has begun preliminary talks with Mexico’s Grupo Modelo about a possible merger. The paper cited anonymous sources who said Anheuser-Busch approached Carlos Fernandez, chief executive of Modelo and an Anheuser-Busch director, about a deal in recent weeks.
Anheuser-Busch already owns a roughly 50 percent non-controlling stake in Modelo. If the companies merge, the combined company could be too big for InBev to purchase. An Anheuser-Busch spokeswoman said no one could comment on the report. A Modelo spokesman was unavailable.
Most Read Business Stories
- 55,000 in Washington state may have to pay back thousands in jobless benefits
- 1 house, 45 offers: Homebuyers in Western Washington hard-pressed as supply remains scarce
- Boeing CEO gave up millions in pay; here's what he and other top execs earned
- Amazon's telehealth arm quietly expands to 21 more states
- Jeff Bezos gets fraction of legal fees from girlfriend’s brother
InBev Chief Executive Carlos Brito spent part of a Thursday morning conference call trying to calm political and regulatory concerns about the deal.
Brito said the merged company, which would be the world’s largest brewer by far, would not violate antitrust laws because it would combine breweries that operate in different geographic markets. Brito downplayed the prospect that InBev would slash U.S. jobs and promised not to close any Anheuser-Busch breweries.
“This compelling combination would create significant value for both companies’ shareholders,” Brito said.
InBev’s offer translates to $65 a share for Anheuser-Busch stockholders, a rich premium over the company’s stock price of $58.35 Wednesday before the offer was made public. Anheuser-Busch’s stock jumped more than 5 percent Thursday to close at $61.40 a share.
Anheuser-Busch management has been largely mum about the deal. The company said Wednesday its board of directors would consider the offer and respond to InBev “in due course,” but did not elaborate. A spokeswoman did not comment further and did not return a message seeking comment Thursday.
Even if senior executives and the board oppose the deal, they might have few options to stop it, said Andy Baker, a vice president of special-situation strategies at the New York-based investment bank Jefferies & Company, Inc.
Anheuser-Busch’s bylaws allow shareholders to bring a motion to vote if just 25 percent approve of a deal, Baker said.
That means the board or senior management must convince shareholders they have a plan to push the stock price to $65 in the near future. The stock has been largely flat over the last two years, hovering in the $50-per-share range, and options to boost it are few, Baker said.
The company could spin off its theme-park division, but that segment generates only $100 million in annual cash flow, compared to Anheuser-Busch’s overall 2007 revenue of $16.7 billion. A merger with Grupo Modelo wouldn’t reach the scale of the InBev deal in terms of revenue for shareholders, Baker said.
“It would take years for the company to get to $65. From a financial point of view, [the InBev offer] makes senses,” Baker said. “There is such a clear path for shareholders to supersede the board that they can do this themselves.”
While the offer might look good on paper, political reaction has been swift. Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo., said he opposed the deal in a letter sent Thursday to Attorney General Michael Mukasey.
“The proposed foreign acquisition of Anheuser-Busch is troubling to me because it potentially raises antitrust issues under existing law by putting a significant market share of the U.S. in the hands of fewer competitors,” the letter said.
Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., said she was “nervous” about the deal, without saying if she would oppose it.
“On behalf of me and all my friends that like nothing better than a Bud Light every summer, it makes us very upset,” McCaskill said.
Missouri’s Republican Gov. Matt Blunt said he opposes the deal and has directed the state Department of Economic Development to see if it can stop it. Blunt’s former chief of staff co-founded a Web site called SaveAB.com that has passed an electronic petition opposing the deal to federal lawmakers. The site promises to hold anti-InBev rallies in the downtown St. Louis Busch Stadium.
Political repercussions from InBev’s offer even touch the presidential race.
Republican presumptive nominee John McCain’s wife Cindy shares roughly $1 million worth of Anheuser-Busch stock with the McCain children. Cindy McCain’s father founded Hensley & Co., a Phoenix beer distributor that describes itself as the third-largest Anheuser-Busch wholesaler in the United States.
Hensley & Co. sold more than 23 million cases of beer last year and is among the nation’s biggest beer distributors regardless of brand. Beverage-industry analysts put Hensley’s annual sales at $300 million or more.
McCain’s campaign did not return a message seeking comment.
It’s unclear how distributors like Cindy McCain’s father James Hensley will view the InBev bid. The national network of independent distributors is a key competitive advantage for Anheuser-Busch, helping the brewer keep its products widely stocked at choice retail locations. The distributors, in turn, are reliant on Anheuser-Busch for a steady stream of products and marketing campaigns.
In spite of any political rhetoric, the only major regulatory hurdle would be passing antitrust concerns with the U.S. Department of Justice, Cogen said.
A Justice Department spokeswoman wouldn’t comment on the proposed combination. But last week the department approved a joint venture between SABMiller PLC’s Miller Brewing Co. and Molson Coors Brewing Co. to distribute their beers in the United States.
Associated Press reporters Sharon Theimer, Sam Hananel and Christopher Rugaber in Washington and Theresa Bradley in Mexico City contributed to this article.