Introduced on New Year's Day 1999, the euro has proved that even in the current financial crisis, it has provided hoped-for stability.
FRANKFURT, Germany — Ten years ago, Europe launched its grand experiment with a shared currency — and watched it plunge in value before recovering.
As the anniversary approaches of the Jan. 1, 1999, arrival of the euro, economists say the new currency is finally fulfilling its promise as a way to lower borrowing costs, ease trade and tourism, boost growth and strengthen the European community.
And doing it amid a global financial crisis that, for the moment, underlines the safety in numbers that comes from joining one, big currency.
Most Read Business Stories
- The penthouse atop Smith Tower is on the rental market for the first time
- Amazon sued by Black cloud-computing manager, over alleged racial discrimination and sexual harassment
- Washington state ‘literally failed workers,’ and fixing the unemployment system won't be easy
- Downtowns will be back, but Seattle has choices to make
- Costco, Whole Foods rise in Greenpeace rankings of grocery chains' plastic use
“After 10 years it has truly created a zone of security and stability,” French Finance Minister Christine Lagarde said in mid-December. “From all these points of view, the euro has in fact proven wrong the forecasts some made against the euro 10 years ago.”
When it was launched for non-cash purposes in 1999, just 11 countries were on board — Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain. Notes and coins were added on Jan. 1, 2002, and the original 11 have been joined by Cyprus, Greece, Malta and Slovenia, with Slovakia slated to join on Jan. 1, bringing the total to 16.
Now, some people in longtime holdouts such as Sweden and even strongly euro-skeptic Britain are beginning to reconsider the question.
Smaller countries such as Iceland, which has stayed out of the EU, and EU member Hungary, which hasn’t yet met the requirements to join the euro, have seen their currencies sink in value and been forced to ask the International Monetary Fund for bailouts.
Otmar Issing, a former board member of the European Central Bank, said the euro’s appeal has been its ability to provide a sense of stability and shelter from the storm of global crises. The bank, created specifically to oversee the euro, has taken a strong anti-inflationary stance that mirrors that of its chief predecessor, Germany’s Bundesbank central bank.
“The euro is a stable currency, inflation expectations were under control right from the start,” Issing said.
“Not surprisingly, quite a few observers — with probably the majority of economists to the fore — were more than skeptical as to the outcome of this experiment,” he said.
The chief complaints from governments during the euro’s first 10 years have arisen from the bank’s one-size-fits-all interest-rate policy — which can’t give rate cuts to individual countries if their economy dips while others rise. But the credit crisis has swept over the global economy due to heavy bank losses on securities backed by U.S. mortgages to people with shaky credit has hit everyone at pretty much same time.
An early plunge
That has helped people forget the euro’s early plunge, from around $1.18 at launch to only 82 cents by October 2000. The European Central Bank (ECB) joined with the Federal Reserve and other central banks in intervening in currency markets to prop it up.
Howard Archer, an economist with IHS Global Insight in London, said, “Obviously in the early days, the euro was weaker and there was some worry about its values.”
But since then, the euro has soared in strength and value, rising to as high as $1.6038 against the dollar this year. It’s down to around $1.40 but has risen strongly against the British pound.
Randall Filer, a visiting professor of economics at Charles University in Prague and Hunter College in New York, said the requirement to cut government debt before joining gave political leaders the backbone to make economic reforms but place the blame on EU requirements.
“It has enabled governments to embark on the labor-market and fiscal reforms that were absolutely necessary,” said Filer. The euro became “a convenient scapegoat” that enabled reforms that were needed but Europe “did not have the political will to do.”
The euro spread the ECB’s tough anti-inflationary stance to countries that didn’t previously have it, said economist Franco Bruni at Italy’s Bocconi University.
“We entered in the euro area, we had integrated finances with other foreign countries, which made it easier to invest abroad,” he said. “Italian banks can operate on a wider scale, and we could buy shares abroad more easily.”
With the inclusion of Slovakia, the euro will be used by about 330 million people with a gross domestic product of more than 4 trillion euros ($5.5 trillion).
Newer EU members such as Poland, the Czech Republic and the Baltic countries Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia are in the process of meeting the conditions of joining the euro zone, but the crisis has put their hopes off for now.
Pro-euro sentiment has risen in euro holdout Sweden, whose weaker krona has helped supporters in their arguments, said economist Lars Calmfors.
He also said EU leaders’ swift response in agreeing to pour billions of new capital and loan guarantees in their financial systems boosted confidence in the euro. “It demonstrates that if you stay outside, you are not present at the table when the decisions are taken,” he said.
Associated Press reporters Greg Keller and Emma Vandore in Paris, Jane Wardell and Emily Flynn Vencat in London, Colleen Barry in Milan and Louise Nordstrom in Stockholm contributed to this story.