Americans lucky to get out of Mexico City with a 0-0 draw
The Americans got away with one. There’s no denying that.
Mexico, playing at home, was the better team. They possessed the ball more, created more scoring chances (17 shots to 1) and corner kicks (15-2) and rarely stopped surging, even after one questionable call went against them early, bookended by an undeniably bad call late.
Facing a young and inexperienced U.S. defense, they effectively turned the last five minutes of the World Cup qualifier Tuesday at Azteca Stadium in Mexico City into target practice. For once, it wasn’t enough.
“You’re never going to come to a place like Azteca and go out and have it nice and easy,” U.S. goalkeeper Brad Guzan said after the 0-0 draw. “So we knew at some point, it was going to come, the pressure was going to come, and we were able to deal with it.”
- Tourists robbed, beaten downtown ‘afraid to go back’ to Seattle
- Animated map: How the wildfires in North Central Washington have grown over time
- Steve Sarkisian was reimbursed by Washington for hefty alcohol bills
- Seahawks safety Kam Chancellor holdout FAQ
- Why did the Mariners’ season go terribly wrong?
Most Read Stories
As a result, the man who wound up on the hot seat at the end was not the one some people expected going in. The injustice of it all no doubt was still sinking in when Jose Manuel De la Torre, the coach of soccer-mad Mexico, was asked afterward whether he expected to keep his job.
“I’m not responsible for that decision,” De la Torre replied coolly. “We have worked hard. The federation has the last word, they and the owners take that decision.”
It’s one measure how far the game has come in the United States that his counterpart, Jurgen Klinsmann, likely would have been grilled — though not nearly as quickly nor audaciously — if his team had lost.
Despite all the history hanging over this game, it’s still early enough in qualifying for the 2014 World Cup for both teams to get in under the wire comfortably.
The bigger surprise might be that finally, there are some expectations for the U.S. side, That was reinforced by the stir a story in the Sporting News kicked up at the start of last week. Quoting unidentified players and people close to the team, it portrayed Klinsmann, a great German player and one-term World Cup coach, as out of touch with the sentiment in his locker room and a poor tactician to boot.
That the U.S. team beat Costa Rica 1-0 in a blizzard in Colorado a few days later did little to quiet the restive mood. Some players were upset with how he benched Carlos Bocanegra, a stalwart of the national team and long its captain. Others were disgruntled over what they viewed as favorable treatment afforded a handful of German imports — all four the sons of U.S. servicemen — and how Klinsmann often kept everyone uncertain by posting his starting lineups at the last minute.
The best thing that emerged from the draw, other than the point — the only other point a U.S. side has earned in Mexico came in a draw in 1997 — was the emergence of Omar Gonzalez as a rock in Bocanegra’s old job, at the center of the defense, a development that could pay big dividends.
Klinsmann wisely avoided any mention afterward of the close calls that could have paid immediate dividends for Mexico. The first one came when U.S. midfielder Michael Bradley pulled down Javier Hernandez, running without the ball in the box. The second, much more egregious, came when Maurice Edu tackled Javier Aquino, who had the ball and was just steps from Guzan, from behind.
Maybe Klinsmann didn’t see the need. Among the other things the rest of the world already knows about the beautiful game that he believes they will understand in good time is this: It’s not always fair, either.