Other issues still looking strongly divided
With five more days and nights — at least — to reach an agreement, the NFL and the players’ union might find money off the top is not the bottom line.
The owners’ request that about $2 billion of total revenues be deducted before they split the rest with the players has been a sticking point since 2008. That’s when the owners opted out of the current collective bargaining agreement, which would have expired last Thursday if not for two extensions.
The deadline now is at the end of Friday, and a compromise on that figure — the owners already deduct about $1 billion for operating expenses from the $9 billion overall take — might be easier than reaching accord on expanding the regular season to 18 games or several other issues.
“We have made player safety our biggest concern, and we won’t back off on that,” said Tennessee Titans guard and player representative Jake Scott.
- Who do post-Combine mock drafts have the Seahawks selecting?
- Belltown ticket trap turns drivers into 'sitting ducks'
- Microsoft pair claim 'hostess bar' expense queries led to firing
- Seattle's new seawall also a highway for fish
- Slugger Nelson Cruz makes strong first impression with Mariners
Most Read Stories
“There are so many moving parts, so much that goes on,” added Saints tackle Jon Stinchcomb, also a player rep. “When you have these CBA negotiations, what we establish now will affect how we do business for years to come. It’s more than just how to slash the pie. It’s how you go to work, what your offseason will look like, benefits for former players, how protected are we when injuries come along. There are so many aspects being negotiated, it takes time to come to an agreement on all these different fronts.”
One front that could have wiggle room is the owners seeking the additional $1 billion, which they say is essential for league and team operations because of the heavy debt many franchises have for stadium construction loans. Such numbers often are negotiable. Although the players aren’t eager to take any sort of pay cut, they might be amenable to a substantially reduced giveback that serves the owners well enough.
The rookie wage scale being proposed also shouldn’t be too contentious as long as the owners plan to divert much of the money they save toward the veteran players and not their own pockets. All those players who wince when they see an untested rookie getting more guaranteed money than they’ve earned in their entire careers are firmly behind such a redistribution of those dollars.