TACOMA — Last year, environmental engineers working for this city had an unnerving worry.
After a decade and tens of millions of dollars devoted to a fastidious cleanup of its corner of Puget Sound, Tacoma’s shoreline was in danger of being contaminated with a highly toxic chemical.
Working their way upstream, the engineers discovered the source of the problem: a storm drain in a residential neighborhood.
Stuck to its sides was black goo — old grout that contained large concentrations of polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs.
- Cleared after stabbing, former UW student wants his life back
- Seattle’s Super Bowl: Not football, but pho
- Teens charged in Jungle shooting grew up amid tumult, drug deals
- Mom’s drug deal brought sons to Jungle, police say
- Shaq Thompson happy to be at Super Bowl, sorry to Seahawks fans
Most Read Stories
Used in local road building in 1975, PCBs, odorless and carcinogenic, were outlawed soon thereafter. Yet they were swept up and sent mostly through drain pipes on their way to Puget Sound.
More than four decades after the 1972 passage of the federal Clean Water Act and after years of expensive cleanups like the one here, industrial water pollution from factory pipes is closely monitored and, by many measures, on the way to being vanquished.
But a menace is coming from a surprising source: rain, and the stormwater it produces.
It scours all corners of a watershed, carrying with it things like leftover industrial pollutants, airborne toxins, automotive oil and grease, pesticides from lawns, and pharmaceuticals from leaky septic tanks.
As Seth Brown, an engineer with the Water Environment Federation, said, normal stormwater runoff “is the only source of water pollution in the country that’s getting worse.”
Brown said that while 40 years ago industrial pipes contributed 85 percent of water pollution, now 85 percent comes from stormwater and the runoff from farmers’ fields. These flows end in bodies of water like Puget Sound and Chesapeake Bay on the East Coast.
As localities try to deal with this largely ignored element of environmental protection, Tacoma’s approach, a combination of science and sheer doggedness, is being studied by officials from as far away as Brazil, Thailand, Italy and Russia.
The critical tool for the city is data — a detailed, continuing and chemically specific picture of what is in seven outlets that flow into the Foss Waterway and then into Puget Sound, as well as what is in nearly 30 sediment traps that hold stormwater from various parts of the city.
New pollution is detected when it shows up as a change in chemical maps of stormwater. Basic forensics — knowing how water gets from point A to point B to point C — create a fingerprint-like reliability in knowing where it came from. That is how the PCBs in the suburban drain were discovered.
Tacoma has other means at its disposal, including the willingness to heavily fine polluters who are caught, persistent pipeline scrubbing and a plan to create so-called rain gardens, something popularized in the Washington, D.C., suburb of Prince George’s County, Maryland, in the early 1990s.
In a rain garden, stormwater, along with the toxins it carries, is reabsorbed in the soil as it was before pavement covered the landscape, keeping the water out of storm drains.
The pollution does not travel and is likely to remain harmless.
Rain gardens, depressions often filled with plants with absorbent root systems, are now a common feature in plans for suburban development nationwide.
“This is a very powerful way of working with stormwater — controlling it at the source,” said Larry Coffman, who was a top engineer for Prince George’s County.
Tacoma’s aggressiveness stems from the city’s determination to never again face the headaches and expense that go with being a designated Superfund site, which was done to Commencement Bay in Tacoma by the EPA.
Under a 1980 law, Congress authorized the EPA to create a priority list of sites where oozing toxic chemicals posed a hazard to human health and the surrounding environment.
Rather than assigning blame to individual industries, Tacoma took on the responsibility of cleaning the site and keeping it clean.
It now also honors legal agreements it has signed promising the federal government that it will stay clean.
“Having invested $105 million, the city is serious about not cleaning up again,” said Mike Slevin, the city’s chief environmental engineer, who controls an annual budget of at least $3.5 million to monitor 440 miles of stormwater pipes.
Slevin can get tough.
When someone recently noticed a white cloud billowing through the seawater, Slevin’s staff traced it upstream to a catch basin near where wrecked cars are stored.
A big rig full of coffee creamer had been towed there after an accidental fire. A local towing company had cleared up the accident and taken the debris to the impoundment center.
But by accident or design — accounts differ — the treads of a small tractor cleaning up the mess crushed a good portion of the creamer containers, sending gallons of the substance into Puget Sound.
The result: a $10,000 fine for the towing company, Bill’s Towing, for its messy cleanup.
“That was our first encounter” with the environmental enforcers, said Tom Lomis, an owner of Bill’s Towing. Now accident cleanups are his passion. “I’m not going to be fined again for not cleaning up a mess,” Lomis said.
He added: “This problem of runoff is relatively new to our industry. Some places really don’t care, but Tacoma is on top of it.”