PORTLAND — Oregon state regulators have rejected a proposal for a coal terminal on the Columbia River that would be a conduit for exporting millions of tons of American coal a year to Asia.
The decision is a victory for tribal groups that said the terminal threatened their fishing and for environmentalists opposed to sending what they call “dirty coal” abroad.
In denying an important permit, the Department of State Lands said Monday the terminal would interfere with what regulators called “a small but important and longstanding fishery in the state’s waters.”
The department said the applicant, Ambre Energy, presented some possible options to mitigate the effect on fishing, but failed to commit to any specific action. It also said Ambre hadn’t properly investigated alternatives that would avoid construction of a new dock.
- Husky guide on UW cheerleading tryouts goes global
- Look like this, not that: UW pulls cheerleader-tryout advice after angry backlash
- Seahawks take Germain Ifedi with first-round pick in NFL draft
- APNewsBreak: Investigators look at overdose in Prince death
- Mexican agents hunting fugitives in Arlington slayings: ‘It’s only going to be a few days’
Most Read Stories
“From reading more than 20,000 public comments to carefully analyzing technical documents and plans, this application has been scrutinized for months,” agency director Mary Abrams said. “We believe our decision is the right one.”
Ambre Energy, based in Brisbane, Australia, wants to transport coal mined from the Powder River Basin in Montana and Wyoming through Oregon to energy-hungry Asian markets. The company proposed bringing the coal by train to Boardman, Ore., where it would be loaded on barges at the Port of Morrow and then sent down the Columbia River to the Port of St. Helens, where it would be transferred to oceangoing ships.
Two other coal terminals have been proposed in Washington state, one near Bellingham and one near Longview.
On July 30, Washington’s Department of Ecology said it was launching an environmental review, unprecedented in scope, of the proposed Gateway Pacific Terminal at Cherry Point in Whatcom County. That undertaking is expected to take about two years.
In February, it was announced there will be an extensive environmental review of the proposed Millennium Bulk Terminals in Longview.
In both instances, the reviews will look beyond the sites — at global-warming effects, for example, and at the impacts of increased rail traffic if coal is shipped across the state.
The Oregon project was expected to generate several hundred jobs during construction at the Port of Morrow and add about 30 port workers permanently.
Ambre said it would pay $850,000 in annual fees to each of the two ports while paying property taxes in Morrow and Columbia counties.
“We disagree with this political decision,” Ambre spokeswoman Liz Fuller said. “We are evaluating our next steps and considering the full range of legal and permitting options.”
Port of Morrow officials did not immediately return messages seeking comment.
Democratic Gov. John Kitzhaber, a major opponent of the terminal who is up for re-election this year, released a statement in support of the decision, saying Columbia River tribes have fundamental rights to fisheries and that projects affecting them should be held to a high standard.
Environmentalists and tribes were thrilled with the ruling.
“Today’s landmark decision reflects what is in the best interest of the region, not a company’s pocketbook,” Carlos Smith, chairman of the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission, said in a statement.
Information from The Seattle Times archives was included in this report.