• Officers shall use force only when necessary and “with minimal reliance upon the use of physical force.”
• While force is sometimes unavoidable, officers should not precipitate the unnecessary use of force.
• Officers shall use only the degree of force that is objectively reasonable and proportional to the threat or resistance.
• Through “advisements, warnings, verbal persuasion, and other tactics,” officers shall seek to de-escalate confrontations.
- Shell icebreaker begins journey after protesters removed from Portland bridge
- Surviving Seattle’s sidewalks: Pedestrian rage rises as the population grows
- Silence deafening as Russell Wilson deadline for extension nears
- Haggen cuts worker hours in Seattle area
- Alaska Airlines has 72-hour sale on fall travel to Hawaii
Most Read Stories
• Officers must carry at least one less-lethal device, such as a Taser, pepper spray, a “bean bag” round or impact device that is unlikely to cause death but potentially could.
• All but minimal force must be reported, including the “intentional pointing of a firearm at a subject.”
• It is inappropriate to use force to punish or retaliate against people; or against people who verbally confront officers; or against handcuffed or restrained individuals.
• Supervisors will be required to review and screen use of force.
• A new Force Investigation Team (FIT) will look into highest-level uses of force, as well as officer-involved shootings, in-custody deaths and serious assaults on officers.
• The Use of Force Review Board is formally incorporated, with the responsibility to review high-level uses of force and identify trends or deficiencies regarding policy, training, equipment or tactics.
— Steve Miletich