OLYMPIA — Despite a majority of Washington state senators having signed a letter in support of a measure requiring insurers to cover abortion, a key lawmaker said Monday it will not advance from her committee.
Republican Sen. Randi Becker, of Eatonville, chairwoman of the Senate Health Care Committee, announced hours after her panel heard testimony on the bill that it would not move forward.
“Even advocates of the bill admit that there is no need for the bill today, as every health insurer in the state of Washington provides for abortion coverage,” Becker said in a written statement. “As such, the decision of the committee is that the bill will not move forward from here this year.”
Her announcement makes clear that special measures would be required for the bill to get to the Senate floor for a vote.
- Power restored after major, hour-long outage in downtown Seattle
- Trump, Clinton win Washington state primary
- Designed in Seattle, this $1 cup could save millions of babies
- Boeing plans hundreds of layoffs in local IT unit
- Walkoff magic! Leonys Martin’s dramatic homer in ninth lifts Mariners
Most Read Stories
The letter in support of the measure — dated March 5 but made public Monday — was signed by 25 of 49 state senators and presented at the packed committee hearing where the bill was debated. After the hearing, frustrated supporters, who had long demanded a hearing on the measure, dismissed it as little more than a charade.
“It was just for show,” said Sen. Karen Keiser, of Kent, one of three Democrats on the seven-member panel. “It was simply a way to provoke a circus, in the sense of having a lot of people show up and wave their ideological persuasions in front of us.”
The hearing attracted more than 250 people from both sides of the abortion issue, with many of those wearing rival buttons and ribbons and dressed in dueling color schemes left to watch the proceedings on a screen in a nearby room.
The bill, which supporters call the Reproductive Parity Act, was passed by the House by a 53-43 vote in February, with mostly Democrats in favor and Republicans opposed.
Gov. Jay Inslee, a Democrat and a bill supporter, has repeatedly urged the Senate to vote on it.
The bill would make Washington the first state to require insurers that cover maternity care — which they all must do — to also pay for abortions. Similar legislation has been introduced each session in the New York State Assembly for more than a decade but has never received a public hearing.
In testimony before Becker’s committee, those supporting the measure said it would ensure continued abortion coverage in the state once federal health-care changes taking effect next year trigger bureaucratic hurdles for insurers paying for the procedure.
The bill would ensure that a woman’s decision about whether to get an abortion “is left with her, her family, her health-care provider and her God,” said Elaine Rose, CEO of Planned Parenthood Votes Northwest, addressing the committee. “Not with government, not with her insurance plan, and with all due respect, not with any of you.”
Opponents countered that abortion-insurance coverage is already widespread in the state. They also said the measure threatens the religious freedoms of businesses and individuals who oppose abortion rights and do not want to subsidize the cost of the procedure for others.
“You all have the Second Amendment right to bear arms, to own a gun,” said Peggy O’Ban, spokeswoman for Human Life of Washington. “But does that mean I have to buy it for you?”
Shortly after the hearing, Sen. Mike Padden, R-Spokane Valley, told bill opponents gathered in the hearing room that momentum was on their side but encouraged them to keep applying pressure on lawmakers to help ensure it doesn’t receive a vote in the full Senate.