Anti-tax activist Tim Eyman was paid nearly $112,000 for his initiative-campaign work last year, according to reports filed with the state Public Disclosure Commission.
And he’s kicking off his latest initiative with a personal loan of $250,000.
Eyman says his compensation came from fundraising appeals that explicitly tell supporters their donations will go to pay him and his longtime initiative partners Jack Fagan and Spokane City Councilman Mike Fagan.
- School board rebukes Bellevue football program; possible two-year ban for coach Butch Goncharoff
- This drone footage of inside Bertha’s tunnel is like something out of ‘Star Wars’
- Five veteran Seahawks whose roles could be most impacted by additions from the NFL draft
- Mayor, Chris Hansen denounce misogynistic comments over council arena vote
- Sport fishermen protesting in La Conner on Wednesday as tribal gill-net salmon fishery gets underway
Most Read Stories
The money is accounted for separately from his initiative campaign funds — a system set up after a 2002 scandal in which Eyman was found to be surreptitiously diverting initiative-campaign money to pay himself.
The cash for Eyman’s salary was distributed in early 2013 as “officer’s compensation,” according to the Public Disclosure Commission (PDC) filings.
Eyman received $111,973 while each Fagan was paid $55,986. The single largest contributor to the Eyman salary fund (called Help Us Help Taxpayers) last year was Bellevue developer Kemper Freeman, who gave $150,000.
In an interview, Eyman said he’s upfront with donors about where their money goes. “This is how much money we were able to raise from our supporters and none of them are complaining,” he said. “I’d probably make more if I sold real estate.”
Eyman was paid about $85,000 in 2012 and $163,000 in 2011, records show. He also has been reimbursed for about $45,000 in expenses since 2011.
Eyman’s $250,000 contribution to his latest initiative showed up in reports filed this week with the PDC. Though the report lists the money as a straight donation, Eyman said it is intended as a loan — he said he borrowed money against his Mukilteo house, just as he did in 2010 for another initiative. (He was repaid for that previous loan last year.)
Eyman’s new initiative seeks to shame state lawmakers into passing a constitutional amendment that would require a two-thirds vote in the Legislature for any tax increases that are not sent for a public vote. That’s a policy that was approved by voters multiple times, but was invalidated as unconstitutional by the state Supreme Court in February.
To get that initiative on the ballot this fall, Eyman would need to collect 246,372 valid signatures from registered Washington voters by July 5. His initiative campaign committee is using his personal loan to get that effort off the ground — paying $50,000 to a Lacey signature gathering company, the PDC reports show.
Longtime Eyman critic Andrew Villeneuve, executive director of Northwest Progressive Institute, said he found the latest PDC filings odd. He questioned why Eyman didn’t report his $250,000 contribution properly as a loan and why he listed his occupation as “retired.”
Villenueve said Eyman and his allies are “profiting handsomely” from their constant churn of initiatives — a cycle that will only be made easier if another of Eyman’s initiatives is approved in November. Initiative 517 would prohibit interference with signature gatherers and give campaigns an extra six months to gather signatures.
Jim Brunner: 206-515-5628 or email@example.com. On Twitter @Jim_Brunner