With the threat of a federal lawsuit looming, Washington state’s Special Commitment Center for sexually violent offenders is trying to improve its admittedly inadequate treatment programs. But the McNeil Island institution is up against some difficult state budget problems.
MCNEIL ISLAND, Pierce County — The campus tucked inside razor-wire-laced electric fences on a restricted and tightly guarded island in Puget Sound houses some of the most dangerous and feared criminals in Washington state.
The 252 sexually violent predators at the Special Commitment Center have completed their prison sentences but were sent to McNeil Island after a judge ruled they would likely hurt someone again. To hold them under the state’s sexual-predator civil-commitment law, officials must provide sex-offender treatment.
But many mental-health experts and residents’ lawyers say the therapy offered to most is inadequate and the programming for those with mental illness or brain injuries ranges from “negligent” to “malpractice.”
An independent inspection team that produces annual reports has repeatedly said some units provide “no obvious treatment” and one unit was “more reminiscent of a correctional setting than a treatment facility.”
Most Read Stories
- 83-year-old woman sexually assaulted in SeaTac assisted-living facility; assailant sought
- What drivers can and cannot do under Washington state's new distracted-driving law
- Put down that cellphone; distracted-driving law is here
- Passage of paid-family-leave act shows power of working together | Op-Ed
- Homeless students drawn to Seattle schools by sports are often cast aside when the season’s over
Disability Rights Washington, an advocacy group, has drafted a federal lawsuit claiming the mistreatment of some residents has left them languishing in the center for years, or decades, without a realistic chance of being released, a violation of their constitutional rights.
Mark Strong, the center’s CEO, said steps have been taken to correct some of the problems, but that the program is constrained by a lack of resources. The Rehabilitation Administration, the agency that oversees the facility, acknowledged the center’s shortcomings in its supplemental state budget request, which seeks an additional $4.1 million over the next two years. The money would pay for the extra staff needed to change its focus from “safety and security” to individualized treatment and rehabilitation.
But getting those funds won’t be easy. The state is under a contempt order for failing to adequately fund public education and is under a federal injunction for not providing timely competency services for mentally ill defendants.
State Rep. Laurie Jinkins, D-Tacoma, said the state is only now seeing the impacts of cuts to mental health made in 2009-2011. Although lawmakers added $100 million to the state’s mental-health system last year, more may be needed.
“I would say, for myself, I don’t ever want to be violating anyone’s constitutional rights,” she said.
Finding staff also poses a challenge. The center has been without a psychiatrist and medical director since August; it has just two psychologists; and it had 33 vacant positions as of mid-October. Like prison guards, workers are sometimes verbally and physically assaulted, and they deal with residents who expose themselves or try to touch inappropriately or cover themselves with feces.
The facility’s location, the “island factor,” is also part of the problem, Strong said. Workers must take a 20-minute ferry ride across Puget Sound twice a day.
Washington is among 21 states that have some variation of a sexual-predator law, and most have faced legal challenges.
On Thursday, a federal judge in Minnesota ordered state officials to conduct risk assessments for all sex offenders held in the state’s civil-confinement program, after ruling earlier this year that the indefinite detentions were unconstitutional. A federal judge in Washington state issued an injunction against the center in 1994 after a jury found the treatment was inadequate. The state responded with changes.
But the center may yet again be headed to court.
Rachael Seevers, with Disability Rights Washington, said issues the group identified in its months-long investigation are wide-ranging, and while the budget requests are a promising first step, “We believe that more comprehensive reform is needed.”
The center’s buildings ring a large green lawn where residents walk, socialize and smoke cigarettes in the shadow of tall pines. The dining hall, medical center and recreation center, complete with wood shop and library, line one side of the ring of buildings.
Residents in the less-restricted Redwood units cook meals and chat freely on telephones. They have a lot of time on their hands because treatment, consisting of group meetings, only takes up about three hours each week. There are no individual therapy sessions. The clinical program requires at least five hours of weekly treatment, but the facility has not met that standard because of the vacant clinical positions, inspectors said.
Across the lawn in the Alder and Cedar units, residents pace behind locked doors and glass walls. They speak to staff through intercoms and get meals in their rooms.
“In Alder, it’s very clear you are a prisoner,” said Virginia Faller, a recently retired public defender who handled many of the center’s cases and is critical of the treatment plan.
As punishment for infractions, some residents are locked in their rooms for weeks or months, a practice experts say causes long-term mental-health damage. Inspectors have repeatedly said isolating residents and using restraints is counter-therapeutic and doing so for long periods is “virtually unheard of in modern psychiatric settings.”
Dr. Alan Abrams, a San Diego-based psychiatrist who evaluated one resident for his court case, said in a deposition that the man, who has a brain injury, “has been significantly damaged by the malpractice” at the center. The man had been assaulted by several residents and has spent months at a time isolated in his room.
The psychiatric treatment he received “is far below the standard of care” and the use of seclusion to punish him violates the facility’s own policies, which say “seclusion shall not be used as a means of discipline,” Abrams wrote.