The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether a juror's comments during trial deliberations can be used to show dishonesty during the jury selection process.

Share story

The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether a juror’s comments during trial deliberations can be used to show dishonesty during the jury selection process.

The justices said Monday they will hear an appeal from a South Dakota man seriously injured in a motorcycle accident with a truck. He sued for negligence, but a jury returned a verdict for the truck owner.

A juror later revealed that another juror commented during deliberations that her daughter had been at fault in a similar case and a lawsuit against her daughter would have “ruined her life.”

The motorcyclist sought a new trial, saying the juror was dishonest during the jury selection process when she claimed she could be impartial.

Unlimited Digital Access. $1 for 4 weeks.

The district court denied the new trial motion and an appeals court agreed.

Custom-curated news highlights, delivered weekday mornings.