Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney's comments expressing doubt about Palestinians' commitment to peace again highlight the closeness of his position to that of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney’s comments expressing doubt about Palestinians’ commitment to peace again highlight the closeness of his position to that of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Romney has sometimes echoed hardline Israeli positions similar to those of Netanyahu, although not always intentionally in public.
In a newly disclosed video clip of a private fundraiser in May, Romney tells wealthy supporters that Palestinians “have no interest” in peace with Israel and that the conflict “is going to remain an unsolved problem.”
The video’s disclosure comes at a time when the Israeli leader, a personal friend of Romney since they worked together in Boston financial houses as young men, has been closely involving himself in the U.S. presidential race.
- 5 things you should know about Microsoft’s Windows 10
- Mariners’ triple play hadn’t been seen since 1955
- Sister-in-law didn’t appreciate delivery support
- Before getting the ax, Steve Sandmeyer show was scraping by
- We’re now a city where gunfire is mere background noise
Most Read Stories
Netanyahu increasingly has criticized allies including President Barack Obama who have failed to agree to declare a “red line” for Iran – one that could trigger a U.S. military response if crossed.
At the same time, he’s clearly sided with Romney while his relationship with Obama has been cool.
It’s extremely rare, almost unheard of, for a foreign leader to do that. Most, in fact, try their hardest to run the other way.
Romney and Netanyahu are “two peas in a pod,” said historian Douglas Brinkley of Rice University.
Brinkley said it’s rare for foreign leaders to get involved in U.S. elections since British leaders tried in the early 1800s. But he also said world leaders who went to college in the United States as Netanyahu did “seem to feel a special kinship to America, and often a feeling that they should interject themselves.”
The Israeli prime minister spent much of his childhood in the Philadelphia suburbs and graduated from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Asked this past Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press” whether Iran already had crossed his “red line,” Netanyahu answered with a football reference:
“They’re in the red zone. You know, they’re in the last 20 yards. And you can’t let them cross that goal line. You can’t let them score a touchdown.”
“This is a matter of urgency,” he told CNN, calling on Obama to take the kind of action President John F. Kennedy took in giving the Soviet Union an ultimatum during the Cuban missile crisis.
Noting that Obama has said that it would be unacceptable for Iran to possess nuclear weapons, Netanyahu said, “If you’re determined to prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons, it means you’ll act before they get nuclear weapons.”
Netanyahu argues he’s not trying to inject himself in the U.S. race, suggesting the U.S. news media is trying to “drag” him into it.
Romney has said he’d chart his policy toward Israel, if elected, by studying everything Obama has said or done – and doing the exact opposite.
In one of several newly disclosed video clips taken secretly during a private fundraiser in May, Romney says: “The idea of pushing on the Israelis to give something up to get the Palestinians to act is the worst idea in the world.”
“We have a potentially volatile solution but we sort of live with it and we kick the ball down the field and hope that ultimately, somehow, something will happen and resolve it,” he added.
Romney stood by his positions at a late Monday news conference although acknowledged he could have phrased his remarks better.
Palestinian lawmaker Hanan Ashrawi called Romney’s remarks “irresponsible and dangerous and both ignorant and prejudiced.” She accused the Republican presidential candidate of “pandering to the Jewish lobby.”
Both Netanyahu and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas declined to comment on Romney’s taped remarks.
While foreign leaders have not made a habit of getting involved in U.S. elections, Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev once bragged to Kennedy that “We elected you.”
When Kennedy asked what he meant, Khrushchev said the Soviet Union expressly decided to wait to release captured U-2 spy plane pilot Gary Powers until after the 1960 election to keep the Republican candidate, Vice President Richard Nixon, from claiming he could deal better with the Soviets.
“Leaders keep their eye on each other, but they try to stay away from each other’s national politics,” said Stephen Hess, a presidential scholar at the Brookings Institution.
In campaign speeches, Romney frequently claims Obama has turned his back on Israel and is too soft on Iran.
Yet despite their policy disagreements, the two rivals seem to be saying roughly the same thing on the subject of a “red line.”
Obama says his red line is “that we’re not going to accept Iran having a nuclear weapon,” without being more specific. And Romney says, “My red line is Iran may not have a nuclear weapon.”
Anthony Cordesman, a Middle East expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said, “You have two presidential candidates working away to see who can get the most votes, and an Israeli prime minister working to figure out how to get the most American support.”
Netanyahu claims Iran is six months to seven months away from having 90 percent of the ingredients for a nuclear bomb. White House spokesman Josh Earnest said that Obama “does believe that there is a diplomatic window that remains open to preventing that red line from being crossed.”
AP writer Amy Teibel in Jerusalem contributed.
Follow Tom Raum on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/tomraum