The comment in the story “Experts faced with 3 possible storm paths,” [Page One, Oct. 17] about the wind storm that referred to the wildly inaccurate predictions by meteorologists is a cheap shot. The problem was that the press wanted to hype the storm and glommed onto to the notion that the storm could be akin to the Columbus Day storm of the 1960s.
If you read the forecasts closely, you could easily tell that this was one possible outcome and not necessarily the most likely. But this little bit of research takes time and effort beyond just reading a short report from the Weather Service. TV media are clearly worse, even though their weather people clearly outlined the forecast’s uncertainty.
Bashing the people who made the forecast isn’t fair. Although it fits one description of journalism that I have always liked. Reporters are like spectators watching a battle — when it is over, journalists go down and shoot the wounded.
Don Pember, Seattle
Most Read Stories
- Milo Yiannopoulos at UW: A speech, a shooting and $75,000 in police overtime
- Best way to slow aging? Exercise, but not just any kind
- Alex Tizon, former Seattle Times reporter who won Pulitzer Prize, dies at 57
- Elon Musk’s SpaceX on brink of `Wright Brothers moment’ with reused rocket
- Wave goodbye: Live Seafair hydroplane-race TV coverage sputters out after 66 years VIEW