I was dismayed and shocked to read Danny Westneat’s column about the City of Kent selling a public park to a developer [“Park’s sale betrays contract with voters,” Local News, Jan. 27].
No wonder people choose not to vote because they think their vote makes no difference. This decision made by a governing body without public input absolutely confirms that. Pine Tree Park may not be popular because of its remote location and lack of parking spaces, but that does not mean it has no value and can be sold off to be gone forever.
Don’t we have it backward? If parks are being neglected because of lack of funds, shouldn’t we be looking for creative ways to maintain them so that voter-approved open spaces can remain for future generations?
Lynne Marachario, Lynnwood
Most Read Stories
- Submarines dismantled in Puget Sound are symbols of nation’s defense dilemma | Jon Talton
- Spike Lee posts, then deletes photo thanking Seahawks' Pete Carroll for signing Colin Kaepernick
- Democrats are supposed to be fighting back, but they just keep losing | Danny Westneat
- Seattle Zestimates are off by $40,000; now hundreds of data crunchers vie to improve Zillow’s model
- Swedish double-booked its surgeries, and the patients didn't know | Quantity of Care