I was dismayed and shocked to read Danny Westneat’s column about the City of Kent selling a public park to a developer [“Park’s sale betrays contract with voters,” Local News, Jan. 27].
No wonder people choose not to vote because they think their vote makes no difference. This decision made by a governing body without public input absolutely confirms that. Pine Tree Park may not be popular because of its remote location and lack of parking spaces, but that does not mean it has no value and can be sold off to be gone forever.
Don’t we have it backward? If parks are being neglected because of lack of funds, shouldn’t we be looking for creative ways to maintain them so that voter-approved open spaces can remain for future generations?
Lynne Marachario, Lynnwood
Most Read Stories
- This season, Seahawks have crossed the line from brash to just plain unlikable | Matt Calkins
- How Seattle Mayor Murray’s plan to help homeless living in RVs unraveled VIEW
- UW star quarterback Jake Browning has surgery on throwing shoulder
- 'It's time for Seattle to shut up': What the national media are saying about the Seahawks' future
- Why are home prices so high? Seattle has 2nd-lowest rate of homes for sale in U.S.