I was dismayed and shocked to read Danny Westneat’s column about the City of Kent selling a public park to a developer [“Park’s sale betrays contract with voters,” Local News, Jan. 27].
No wonder people choose not to vote because they think their vote makes no difference. This decision made by a governing body without public input absolutely confirms that. Pine Tree Park may not be popular because of its remote location and lack of parking spaces, but that does not mean it has no value and can be sold off to be gone forever.
Don’t we have it backward? If parks are being neglected because of lack of funds, shouldn’t we be looking for creative ways to maintain them so that voter-approved open spaces can remain for future generations?
Lynne Marachario, Lynnwood
Most Read Stories
- What drivers can and cannot do under Washington state's new distracted-driving law
- Federal judge: ‘The citizens of Seattle are not going to pay blackmail for constitutional policing’
- '450 square feet of fear': Renter dreads rising cost for Fremont studio apartment | Seattle Sketcher
- Man shot at Seattle's Golden Gardens Park amid apparent gunfight
- Pac-12 football preview: Washington an overwhelming favorite in the North