Japan is of gigantic importance to the U.S. and to the world. That nation of a mere 127 million in population squeezed into one relatively...
LOS ANGELES — Japan is of gigantic importance to the U.S. and to the world. That nation of a mere 127 million in population squeezed into one relatively small island developed into the second-largest economy in the world. Its engineering skill became legendary. Its national literacy level is exemplary. It’s a very serious place, with astonishing achievements in the arts, in design and, of course, in electronics. (Their automobiles aren’t so bad, either.) And it holds in its hands more U.S. government bonds and other critical official U.S. investments than any country in the world, including China.
But there is one bad thing about Japan: its political system.
You may have noticed that they talk a lot about the need for “consensus” in Japan, before any major political change or innovation can occur. One reason, among many, for all the talk is that in Japan, true political leadership is often hard to find.
During the past decade or so the country has seen more prime ministers entering and then being hurled back out on the street from the revolving door of power than people could count. In the high echelons of the Clinton administration, there was this running joke: “Hey, we just figured out how to pronounce the name of the new Japanese prime minister and now he’s gone!”
- Nurse dies from injuries in attack near CenturyLink Field
- Woman knocked unconscious by falling drone during Seattle's Pride parade
- Residents return to ‘war zone’ in wake of Wenatchee wildfire
- Tukwila group to submit expansion application to NHL
- Legislature OKs new budget with rare tuition cuts and pay raises for teachers
Most Read Stories
For about five years, though, one giant political figure arrested this distressing development. His name was Junichiro Koizumi, and he was the Houdini of Japanese politics. This master of image politics held together the long-running, dominant, but fatally flawed Liberal Democratic Party by the perverse but amazingly effective tactic of attacking it, challenging it and at times purging it of its most dinosaurlike elements.
Super-K could get away with this because his leadership functioned within a very clear public consensus. The consensus of the people of Japan was that this prime minister probably knew what he was doing.
It was a very opposite consensus that triggered the resignation of his successor as prime minister after less than a year on office. The general view on the street about Shinzo Abe — patrician, young (relatively, at 52) and seemingly nearly always out of it — was that the new prime minister probably did not know what he was doing.
“Abe was under extraordinary strain, and it was showing,” commented The Oriental Economist, the sharp-eyed monthly that offers a most reliable insider look at Japan. “Usually amiable and pleasant to be around, Abe in recent days had become somewhat short-tempered and curt with aides.”
Now he is out, having resigned in abject political decline, having checked into a Tokyo hospital for fatigue and other ailments, and having virtually nothing to say about who is to become his successor. On the contrary, those in the Cabinet who were known to be closest to Abe, such as Foreign Minister Taro Aso, would seem to have lost ground. And those who have been well removed from the Abe loop, such as semi-retired old hand Yasuo Fukuda, are suddenly back in the limelight.
The succession issue is important to the world and to the United States. Japanese prime ministers do their friends and allies no favors when they insensitively insult neighbors by denying well-known horrors like the reality of World War II comfort-women atrocities. Japanese leaders who push the military expansion button too quickly or with excessive relish add to East Asian tensions.
And, of course, when the Japanese economy starts humming along nicely, which happened during the upbeat Koizumi years, this is on the whole helpful and healthy not only for Japan but for Asia and the West. Again, it is not possible to overestimate the importance of being Japan, especially with the U.S. economy looking to stall, and China’s economy looking to be too amazingly hot to be genuinely all that solid.
In addition, under Koizumi and then Abe, Japan had become increasingly important to the Bush administration. Tokyo had sent a token contingent of troops to Iraq; it had sent a naval presence to the Indian Ocean to add to the supply trail for U.S. troops in the region. Now all Japanese troops are out of Iraq and the naval presence will probably be withdrawn when the Japanese legislation authorizing it expires on Nov. 1.
Whoever succeeds Abe is, in immediate relations with the U.S., less likely to position himself as a Tony Blair-type prime minister (fawning and lapdog-like) than as the current British PM Gordon Brown (friendly enough, but cool and correct).
What’s more, it may take a few years for Japan to sort out its political system. Washington may have to learn how to pronounce several new Japanese names before Japan’s political system uncovers a stabilizing politician like that swami-Shogun Koizumi.
UCLA professor Tom Plate, a board member of the Burkle Center for International Relations, is a veteran journalist and author of “Confessions of an American Media Man.”