WITH the failures of grand New Year’s resolutions trailing me like toilet paper on my shoe, I resolved to go small this year. I’ll do all my neighborhood shopping on foot or bike. That’s it.
I got a jump on my mini-resolution Tuesday night when, on my way to the grocery store a half-mile away, I came across a guy scowling beneath a hoodie on a corner.
In a car, that’s all I might have seen. I would’ve missed a point of connection — the beer growler under his arm. We shared raves about favorites at Bottleworks, the Wallingford beer store where he was headed, and a New Year’s fist bump.
That interaction was on my mind as I read a compelling study out of the University of Surrey that tries to untangle the social costs of the automobile.
- 2 people killed in Seattle-area windstorm identified
- High winds stall firefighting efforts, fuel Tunk Block, Lime Belt fires
- Steven Hauschka's 60-yard FG gives Seahawks final edge over Chargers
- Chargers players upset with Frank Clark
- White House renames Mount McKinley as Denali on eve of trip
Most Read Stories
It asked participants to rate their responses based on short videos — images shot from perspectives on foot, on bike, on a bus seat or from a car — of an “ambiguous” social setting: kids in a park play-fighting over a sheet of paper as a girl, sitting on a nearby park bench, texted on her phone.
People who saw the driver-view video, which had the quickest view and the least clear sound, concluded, in a flash, that the kids were a threat. They felt annoyed. Walkers, who heard the most, found the kids well-educated, or funny.
A related experiment, conducted with videos of poorer and richer neighborhoods, reached a similar conclusion: car drivers, in a flash, decided the “bad becomes worse and good becomes better.”
Those snap judgments — described as “thin slices” in Malcolm Gladwell’s best-selling book “Blink” — serve to confirm preconceptions and biases. Absent more information, we go to our default settings. Take in more, and, as the study suggests, you find your neighborhood has a rosier glow.
I’ve experienced the city on foot, on bike and by car for more than two decades and am consistently surprised by the difference between Seattle experienced via car and out of the car. The laminated safety glass of an automobile windshield becomes an information cocoon.
This month, the Seattle City Council will begin deliberating the Bike Master Plan, the multi-decade blueprint that knits the city together via bike highways and neighborhood byways. It is sprawling, and probably too expensive to fully do.
But it offers enticement for people to experience more than very thin, drive-by slices. Get out of the car, and you may get your New Year’s fist bump.
Editorial board members are editorial page editor Kate Riley, Frank A. Blethen, Ryan Blethen, Sharon Pian Chan, Lance Dickie, Jonathan Martin, Thanh Tan, Lynne K. Varner, William K. Blethen (emeritus) and Robert C. Blethen (emeritus).