I know, governor: It’s still too early for presidential speculation, you’re just focused on the job at hand and any talk of 2016, while flattering, is purely hypothetical.
But just in case you have some extremely modest interest in parlaying your landslide re-election into a presidential bid, here are four 2016 “don’ts” to keep in mind:
Don’t be Jon Huntsman. This sounds easy enough, but obvious pitfalls are still worth pointing out. For the next two years, you’re going to be hailed up and down the Acela Corridor as the Great Moderate Hope, the anti-tea party candidate, the Man Who Is Not Ted Cruz. But you can’t actively embrace that part, or give off the impression — as Huntsman did, obviously and fatally — that you agree with the media that your party’s full of rubes and cranks.
You have to woo base voters, not run against them, and make them feel respected though they disagree with you. This doesn’t mean muzzling yourself. It means persuading conservatives you understand them and that as president you’ll be (mostly) on their side.
Most Read Stories
Don’t be Rudy Giuliani. You probably think you wouldn’t have Rudy’s problems in a Republican primary. Yes, you’re both combative Northeasterners from the party’s moderate flank, but unlike the former mayor you aren’t a social liberal with a history of adultery.
But what felled Giuliani in 2008 weren’t just “values” issues. It was his belief that being a national hero was a sufficient qualification to be president — that he could just show up, be “Rudy,” and the rest would take care of itself.
As another charismatic politician defined by your handling of a catastrophe, you’re vulnerable to the same temptation: the belief that you, personally, are the solution to the Republican Party’s problems, and that you can just run on your own awesomeness. That act is likely to wear especially thin in a party that needs a new agenda as badly as Republicans do today. Which brings us to …
Don’t assume that what worked in Jersey will work nationally. You and your fellow Republican governors love to contrast your successes with the national party’s struggles. But those successes are possible because of differences between state-level issues and national ones.
In New Jersey, for instance, you’ve successfully isolated public-sector unions, portraying them as drains on middle-class tax dollars and enemies of the common good. But in national budget debates, the biggest issues are popular entitlement programs, not teacher salaries or bureaucrats’ health benefits. You aren’t going to win the presidency wagging your finger at Social Security recipients, or painting the poor and elderly as special-interest groups. You need to show you’re on the middle class’ side, and you won’t find it unless you …
Don’t always listen to your donors. As a standard-bearer for pragmatic, non-apocalyptic Republicanism who also hails from a state where lots of rich Wall Streeters sleep at night, you’re going to be awash in money — and lots of unsolicited advice. Some good: The Republican donor class has a better handle on certain political realities than the tea party. But some advice will be terrible, because the right’s donors are loath to acknowledge their party’s biggest problem isn’t gay marriage, immigration or the government shutdown. It’s a brand identity, cemented by Mitt Romney’s “47 percent” remark, as the handmaiden of Big Business and the rich.
To alter that identity, you’ll need substance as well as regular-guy style: a tax plan that doesn’t play just as a giveaway to the 1 percent, a health-care plan that isn’t just a defense of the pre-Obamacare status quo, an approach to spending that targets corporate welfare as well as food stamps.
The good news is that you already have populist politicians like Utah’s Sen. Mike Lee leading the charge into this territory, so you can follow without worrying too much about being attacked as a Republican In Name Only (RINO) sellout squish. The bad news is that you’ll have a lot of big bundlers cornering you to explain that actually it’s much more important to cut capital-gains taxes or preserve the carried-interest loophole for hedge funds, and why can’t you move to the center on social issues and stick with upper-bracket tax cuts, because after all they worked in the Reagan era …
Which they did — in a completely different economic and political landscape. So if you want to have an era of your own, you’ll need to nod politely, crush your advice-giver with a handshake and then take a different path.
© , New York Times News Service
Ross Douthat is a regular columnist for The New York Times.