THE Seattle Children’s Hospital dispute with Premera opens the unsolved puzzle of Obamacare: cost.
Children’s is a full-service hospital delivering top-flight specialty care. It treats kids, many with serious problems: cancer, cystic fibrosis, seizures, hemophilia, etc. For some of its services, no other hospital in the state provides care. For some families, access to Children’s medical experts and care is crucial.
Children’s tends, by the nature of its patients’ challenges, to be more expensive.
The plans Premera is selling on the state-etablished exchange for 2014 will cover only those services of Children’s that no other hospital offers. Treatments other hospitals do offer — for pediatric appendectomy, asthma, tonsillitis, nausea, etc. — typically cost twice as much at Children’s, Premera says. And to keep the cost of insurance down, those will be done somewhere else.
- Death of Evergreen senior, other player injuries renew football-safety debate
- Our state’s greatest gift to the nation just got canceled
- Clay Matthews tells Colin Kaepernick: ‘You ain’t Russell Wilson, bro’
- Seahawks Game Center: Seattle holds off Detroit Lions for 'Monday Night Football' victory
Most Read Stories
Children’s says the kids it serves are typically sicker than at other hospitals, and that those patients need full access to the hospital’s specialists and resources. The hospital has filed a complaint with an administrative law judge demanding that Insurance Commissioner Mike Kreidler, who approved the Premera and Lifewise insurance plans, remove them from the exchange.
As a way to negotiate a last-minute concession, this is a burn-the-bridges tactic. If removal actually happened, some rural counties would have no coverage available — or no coverage that included independent physicians. Without Premera and Lifewise, there would be no individual coverage for sale.
Children’s is arguing, in essence, that the market requires it in every plan in the state. No doubt it would be best if Children’s were in every plan. But the insurers are supposed to negotiate costs with hospitals, and it is unclear how that can work if one hospital is declared to be indispensable.
Kreidler is trying to square that circle, and good luck to him. Next March, his office will define the minimum network of doctors and hospitals required for a plan that will have to be sold in 2015. In the meantime, the plans on the exchange are all lawful. People in the market for coverage should choose carefully the plan that fits their needs.