Online activity surrounding the big game actually declined by some measures — an unusual occurrence for big public events in the age of social media.
Despite another season of Super Bowl-sized hype from Silicon Valley, some tech companies didn’t exactly win this year. Online activity surrounding the big game actually declined by some measures — an unusual occurrence for big public events in the age of social media.
Facebook said 60 million people shared something about the game through its network, contributing a total of 200 million posts, comments and likes. That fell from last year’s Super Bowl, when 65 million people contributed 265 million posts, comments or likes. Numbers dropped even after Facebook rolled out a new real-time experience for football fans with its Sports Stadium feature, which struggled with spotty performance during the NFL championship game. A spokesman for the company blamed “overwhelming traffic and activity.”
Twitter saw 16.9 million tweets about the game from 3.8 million unique authors, according to Nielsen’s Twitter TV rankings. That’s a decline of about a third from last year, when Nielsen counted 25.1 million tweets.
The change may indicate more about the games’ level of drama than the social-media platforms themselves. While quarterbacks Cam Newton and Peyton Manning brought star power, the Carolina Panthers and Denver Broncos simply aren’t as popular as last year’s contenders, the New England Patriots and Seattle Seahawks. And this year’s defensive game — which Denver won, 24-10 — probably left the average fan with less to say. CBS also reported lower television ratings compared with last year.
Most Read Stories
- Costco is testing a new burger in Seattle, and it might remind you of Shake Shack
- UW study finds Seattle’s minimum wage is costing jobs
- Check out the Pike Place Market’s $74M addition: See 360-degree views of the new MarketFront VIEW
- The Willows Inn on Lummi Island to pay workers $149K for wage, overtime violations
- Calling their bluff: A Seattle doctor pegs what the GOP health bill is really about | Danny Westneat
Still, online activity seemed to stagnate around another major part of the Super Bowl unrelated to the game’s intensity — the advertisements. Presumably people don’t stop watching advertisements on YouTube just because Carolina’s offensive line can’t get Newton enough time to throw any long touchdown passes.
According to a blog post dated Monday from video-sharing site YouTube, viewers have watched almost 4 million hours of Super Bowl advertisements or ad teasers so far this year. That’s about the same as last year, a striking difference from the audience growth from 2014 to 2015, when the time spent with ads on YouTube almost doubled. Even though time spent with YouTube ads didn’t change much, the actual number of ads watched did increase. People watched Super Bowl ad-related content 330 million times by Monday morning, up from 234 million times last year. One explanation for the discrepancy could be that last year’s videos were longer.
Facebook-owned photo-sharing app Instagram, for the first time, had a Super Bowl video channel, where it pulled in content from celebrities, fans and football players. The company said 38 million people had 155 million interactions related to Super Bowl 50, including posts, likes and comments.
Still, for Facebook, Google and Twitter, most new growth is coming from outside the United States, and those users are less interested in American football.