Northwestern University football players on scholarship are employees of the school and, therefore, entitled to hold an election to decide whether to unionize, an official of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ruled Wednesday.
The stunning decision, coming after a push by former star quarterback Kain Colter backed by organized labor, has the potential to alter dramatically the world of big-time college sports.
The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and universities set the rules and strike the lucrative deals with TV networks and sponsors, exerting near total control over the activities of players known as “student athletes.”
But now those football players, at least at Northwestern, are employees, too, and may seek collective-bargaining status, according to the 24-page ruling by Peter Sung Ohr, the regional director of the NLRB.
- WSU study: 'Exploding head syndrome' more common than once thought
- Oregon Zoo elephant Rama euthanized; loved to paint
- Ivar's to raise restaurant workers' wages to $15 right away
- Orca baby boom continues with discovery of fourth calf
- Bertha's damaged cutter head emerges from pit
Most Read Stories
Ohr’s decision is “revolutionary for college sports,” said Robert McCormick, a professor emeritus at Michigan State University College of Law who focuses on sports and labor law.
Experts said the ruling could impact beyond Northwestern’s locker room, potentially influencing other players, schools and state and federal agencies.
For example, McCormick said that if college players demand compensation for injuries sustained during training or a game, Ohr’s opinion could raise the question of whether they should be treated as employees under the state Workers’ Compensation Act.
The decision also opens the door for athletes with scholarships at public universities to move more quickly to unionize because state labor boards, which govern public universities, usually follow labor law interpretations issued by the NLRB.
There were many questions left unanswered, including whether a union vote among Northwestern players would succeed, but Ohr’s decision is preliminary. Northwestern immediately said it will appeal to the NLRB in Washington, and experts anticipate the case ultimately could be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court.
“Northwestern believes strongly that our student-athletes are not employees, but students,” the Evanston, Ill., university said in a statement. “Unionization and collective bargaining are not the appropriate methods to address the concerns raised by student-athletes.”
Pac-12 Commissioner Larry Scott told The Seattle Times: “We disagree with the ruling and believe that health and economic issues raised by student-athletes are best handled as part of the collegiate model, between universities and their students.”
Northwestern’s football players are the first in college sports to seek union representation. Behind the effort is the College Athletes Players Association, or CAPA, a union funded by Ramogi Huma, a former UCLA linebacker who has become an advocate for players’ rights. CAPA is backed by the United Steelworkers, which is covering legal expenses.
“This is a huge step toward justice for college athletes,” Huma said.
Huma said the NCAA invented the term “student-athletes” 60 years ago in an attempt to prevent students from unionizing. Wednesday’s decision, he said, asserts the rights of college athletes under labor law.
The union has said it would seek to negotiate over health and safety issues and does not intend to push for “pay-for-play” wages, which are not allowed under regulations issued by the NCAA.
Among its demands, CAPA is seeking financial coverage for former players with sports-related medical expenses, independent concussion experts to be placed on the sidelines during games and the creation of an educational trust fund to help former players graduate.
It also wants players to receive compensations for commercial sponsorships, which it says is consistent with “evolving” NCAA rules.
In siding with the union, Ohr said the football players primarily have an economic relationship with the university, which controls and directs their daily activities and compensates them in the form of scholarships, which are worth about $76,000 per academic year if the player enrolls in summer classes.
“The record makes clear that the employer’s scholarship players are identified and recruited in the first instance because of their football prowess and not because of their academic achievement in high school,” Ohr wrote.
Football players with scholarships, he said, “fall squarely” within the labor law’s definition of an employee. Ohr said those players spend many more hours on their football duties than on their studies. Furthermore, he said, the players are subject to special rules and policies that do got govern the general population.
For example, he said, freshmen and sophomore students on scholarships are required to live on campus. Upperclassmen, he added, can live off campus but are required to submit their lease for approval to their coach, Pat Fitzgerald.
“Even the players’ academic lives are controlled as evidenced by the fact that they are required to attend study hall if they fail to maintain a certain grade-point average (GPA) in their classes,” Ohr wrote.
Northwestern argued that the term “student athlete” is still appropriate. “We believe that participation in athletic events is part of the overall educational experience for those students, not a separate activity.”
The school had said that if students were to be found to be its employees, they would be “temporary employees” and could not engage in collective bargaining.
Ohr disagreed. Per NCAA rules, he said, the players remain on the team for at most five years, but “given the substantial length of the players’ employment it is clear that they cannot be found to be temporary employees under Board law.”
Last month, Colter, the union’s star witness, described the grueling football schedule that led him to drop his pre-med course load and switch to a less-demanding major. Colter spoke of 50- to 60-hour workweeks and a coach who was “the bossman.” He stressed that participating in football was a job, and as a result of it, he couldn’t pursue his dream of becoming an orthopedic surgeon.
On Wednesday, Colter, who is training in Florida, was getting ready for practice when he saw a message from the union’s attorney.
“We won!” he yelled.
Colter said he loves Northwestern and thinks Fitzgerald is the “best coach in the nation,” but that doesn’t take away from the fact that college football players are employees of the university and have the right to unionize, he said.
Colter said he is confident that if an election were held soon, the majority of Northwestern football players would vote to unionize. In January, he said, nearly all of the players with scholarships signed union cards.
A bemused Washington State University football coach Mike Leach, asked Wednesday about the decision, said in a teleconference with reporters: “If somebody wants to be regarded as a professional, that actually kind of suits me. If these guys are professionals, then they want everything to be like it is in the NFL. That means we’re shortly going to be having a draft, and I, for one, would be pretty excited about having a whole nation of quality athletes to draft from. I’m looking forward to that.”
A Northwestern scholarship player, who declined to be identified, said he was happy being a student athlete and uncertain how he would vote, but he understood Colter’s argument for unionization. “I think it would benefit us because the NCAA is kind of backwards in how they kind of put restrictions on student athletes.”
William Gould IV, a former chairman of the NLRB, said Ohr’s decision offers a thorough, factual examination of the issues and he is confident the NLRB will uphold it.
“This is a landmark decision,” Gould said. “This is going to rattle the universe of universities.”
Seattle Times college football reporter Bud Withers contributed.