Relatives of China's president and other business and political leaders are linked to offshore tax havens that help "shroud the communist elite's wealth," a U.S.-based journalism group said Wednesday.
Relatives of China’s president and other business and political leaders are linked to offshore tax havens that help “shroud the communist elite’s wealth,” a U.S.-based journalism group said Wednesday.
The report by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists might fuel politically awkward attention on President Xi Jinping’s family and its wealth at a time when Xi has made fighting corruption a theme of his leadership.
Complaints that relatives of China’s leaders abuse their positions to profit from real estate and other deals are widespread. But details on their activities, especially those at the highest party levels, are often hidden.
The ICIJ, based in Washington, said it obtained documents showing the identities of nearly 22,000 owners of companies and trusts in the British Virgin Islands, Samoa and other offshore centers. It said they include Xi’s brother-in-law, former Premier Wen Jiabao’s son and son-in-law and relatives of other ruling party figures.
- With death on table, McEnroe jury's friendships crumbled
- To retire at 55 takes big savings
- Salary cap expert Joel Corry with another look at Russell Wilson's contract
- Microsoft employees -- past and present -- look back over the years
- No time to eat in Silicon Valley, so techies chug their protein
Most Read Stories
“Close relatives of China’s top leaders have held secretive offshore companies in tax havens that helped shroud the communist elite’s wealth,” the group said.
Chinese authorities moved quickly to block the country’s public from seeing Wednesday’s report. Access to the ICIJ website was blocked, as were foreign news reports about it. A reporter posted an Internet link to the report on the popular Sina Weibo microblog service but received a message from the company saying other users were blocked from seeing it.
“From a reader’s point of view, the logic in the article is hardly convincing,” said a foreign ministry spokesman, Qin Gang, when asked for comment at a regular briefing. “That is sure to raise suspicions over the motives behind it.”
Such offshore entities are legal and often are used by Chinese companies to control foreign subsidiaries, but activists believe corrupt officials also might use them to hide money. Governments of such offshore financial centers have come under pressure from other countries to do more to prevent tax evasion, money laundering and other offenses.
Their use by relatives of Chinese officials gives a strong impression of privilege and impunity, said Chinese historian and political analyst Zhang Lifan.
“It is unfair and will lead to discussions about whether the anti-corruption campaign is real or just a tool in a political power struggle,” Zhang said.
Speculation over potential new targets for the crackdown intensified after a Hong Kong newspaper published a letter by Wen, the former premier, in which he said he never abused his position for personal gain, Zhang said.
The sheer size of the wealth being transferred suggests any serious anti-corruption crackdown might face difficulties, said Ho-Fung Hung, a China expert at Johns Hopkins University in the United States.
“Anybody who tries to really get to the heart of the problem might face a collective backlash from the elite, jeopardizing his own power, so I expect the anti-corruption drive won’t go beyond such matters as banquets and travel for a while,” Hung said.
The revelations raise the possibility that banks involved might have hoped for benefits in the China market in exchange for helping to move assets abroad, he said
“Most Chinese leaders and CCPC (Communist Party) members have planned their escape decades ago,” said a comment left by a reader on the website of the Hong Kong newspaper South China Morning Post. “It’s all about exploiting the resources and people in China to benefit the privileged few.”
ICIJ gave no financial details and stressed it was not suggesting anyone named has “broken the law or otherwise acted improperly.” The group said it would release a full list of names on Thursday.
Communist leaders are intensely sensitive to suggestions they have profited from China’s economic boom. The ruling party insists public scrutiny of their financial affairs is not permitted.
Complaints about the lavish lifestyles of officials, party figures and military officers who drive luxury cars, own villas and send their children to elite foreign universities have fueled political tensions.
Police have detained activists who called for party leaders to disclose their wealth to China’s ceremonial parliament.
Xi’s brother-in-law, Deng Jiagui, a wealthy developer, owns 50 percent of a British Virgin Islands company, Excellence Effort Property Development, according to ICIJ. It said the other half is owned by two other Chinese developers.
The list also includes relatives of former President Hu Jintao and the late supreme leader Deng Xiaoping.
In 2012, Bloomberg News and The New York Times reported on wealth amassed by relatives of Xi and Wen, the former premier. The government blocked access to the websites of the two organizations.
AP writer Christopher Bodeen contributed.
International Consortium of Investigative Journalists: www.icij.org