A Dallas judge's handling of a rape case and her suggestion that the 14-year-old victim was lying has outraged the city's top prosecutor, who said the case makes other victims reluctant to help authorities.
A Dallas judge’s handling of a rape case and her suggestion that the 14-year-old victim was lying has outraged the city’s top prosecutor, who said the case makes other victims reluctant to help authorities.
State District Judge Jeanine Howard voluntarily recused herself from the case of 20-year-old Sir Young, who pleaded guilty to raping the girl in 2011. Howard sentenced Young to probation and limited some of the conditions a sex offender might normally receive.
It wasn’t just the sentence itself that has sparked criticism. Howard also initially ordered Young to do 250 hours of community service at a rape crisis center. But The Dallas Morning News reported that the Dallas Area Rape Crisis Center does not want him to complete his hours there.
Howard didn’t return messages left by The Associated Press on Monday, but she told the newspaper last week that she questioned the veracity of the teen’s story. She also said she never intended for Young to work with rape victims and thought he could mop floors, mow the lawn or cook.
- Purple Heart plant bed vandalized days before Memorial Day
- Central District’s shrinking black community wonders what’s next
- Refusal in Bernie Sandersland to accept reality is really unreal
- Boeing tankers will be delivered to Air Force late — and incomplete
- Seattle’s vanishing black community
Most Read Stories
Dallas County District Attorney Craig Watkins, in an interview Monday with the AP, said his prosecutors would ask the new judge to order a review of Young’s probation and possibly tighten the conditions.
Watkins said he was concerned about the potential “that rape victims may not come forward” due to the case.
“The judge basically blamed the victim for what happened to her,” he said, adding: “In this case, when a victim comes forward and the person that they put their trust in — the judge — calls into question their credibility … does a disservice to our ability as prosecutors.”
The judge said the teen had agreed to have sex with Young, just not at school. Howard said medical records suggested that the girl had three sexual partners and had given birth, which her mother denies.
“She wasn’t the victim she claimed to be,” Howard said. “He is not your typical sex offender.”
She also defended not sentencing Young to prison.
“There are rape cases that deserve life. There are rape cases that deserve 20 years,” Howard told the newspaper. “Every now and then you have one of those that deserve probation. This is one of those and I stand by it.”
Howard recused herself Friday, telling the Morning News last week that she did so in order to explain her decision.
Watkins said his prosecutors had pushed for five years’ prison time. He also said the judge declined to require Young to follow standard sex offender requirements such as attending treatment, undergoing an evaluation or staying away from children. Prosecutors will ask the new judge to order a full evaluation of his probation and potentially stricter conditions.
Young does have to register as a sex offender for the rest of his life and is spending 45 days in jail as a condition of probation.
Watkins has previously spoken out about what he sees as the misconduct of some Dallas judges, particularly one who cited him for contempt of court last year in a high-profile mortgage fraud case. Watkins allowed six prosecutors from his office to run for judgeships in this year’s primary elections.
Howard is running unopposed for re-election this fall. Watkins said it was too late for someone to challenge her, but that “hopefully, going forward, we’ll have judges that are more responsible.”