Share story

LONDON — In a surprise, Pakistan’s government Wednesday sharply revised downward its official estimate of civilian deaths caused by U.S. drone strikes in the tribal belt, highlighting again the contentious nature of statistics about the covert CIA campaign.

The Ministry of Defense released figures to lawmakers saying that 67 civilians were among 2,227 people killed in 317 drone strikes since 2008. The remainder of those killed were Islamist militants, the ministry said.

The figures represented a civilian-death rate of about 3 percent, falling far below earlier estimates from independent groups — and other government departments — that reported a rate of 6 percent and higher during the same period.

Recently, a U.N. special rapporteur on human rights and counterterrorism, Ben Emmerson, said the Pakistani government had reported at least 400 civilian deaths since the drone campaign started in 2004.

This week, save 90% on digital access.

In an email, Emmerson noted the revised figures were “strikingly at odds” with those he had been given earlier by the Pakistani Foreign Ministry and said he would be writing to the government seeking clarification.

In a twist, the latest figures place the Pakistani government on much the same page as the CIA, which Pakistan has condemned for breaching its sovereignty in running the drone campaign.

Although the drone program remains classified and the Obama administration has never given an official estimate of civilian deaths, the CIA and officials from other U.S. agencies have insisted the strikes have been accurate and have killed only a small number of civilians.

And for all the angry denials from Pakistani military and civilian officials, a steady drip of news-media leaks and other evidence suggests that they have quietly cooperated with at least some drone strikes.

Activists insist that civilian deaths remain a serious problem. The discrepancy in the various figures highlights the opaque nature of the U.S. campaign and the failure of the Pakistani authorities to properly investigate drone strikes, said Mustafa Qadri, a researcher with Amnesty International.

The U.S. government should be “the first place to ask” about death figures, he said in an email. “If the strikes are precise and legal, then the U.S. should disclose the videos of the strikes and their full legal basis.”

A related problem, experts say, is trying to define civilians and deaths in a remote-conflict zone like North Waziristan, particularly given that the international debate over the legality of drone strikes remains unresolved.

Ascertaining the truth about what happens in the tribal belt, a lawless area along the Afghan border, is notoriously difficult. And new evidence from human-rights groups, bolstered by witness testimony delivered by a Pakistani family in Washington, D.C., this week, suggests the drones are not as foolproof as U.S. — and now some Pakistani — officials have suggested.

Last week, Amnesty International published an investigation, written by Qadri, that concluded that at least 19 civilians were killed in two drone strikes in 2012, including a woman in North Waziristan who was picking vegetables in a field with her grandchildren. The new official Pakistani figures stated that no civilians were killed in North Waziristan in 2012 or this year.

The dead woman’s son and two grandchildren held a news conference in D.C. on Tuesday to speak about the attack.

One of the grandchildren, Nabila Rehman, 9, described seeing two missiles fired from a drone kill her grandmother as they worked together in the field. Speaking in Pashto through an interpreter, the girl also said she had suffered shrapnel wounds in her right hand.

The girl was accompanied by her father, an elementary-school teacher, and her 13-year-old brother, Zubair ur-Rehman, who said he preferred cloudy days when bad weather grounded the drone fleet.

“When the sky brightens and becomes blue, the drones return, and so does the fear,” he said.

Only a small number of Democratic lawmakers attended the briefing, which was arranged by the Brave New Foundation, a liberal advocacy group that has funded a new documentary about the drone wars.

Rep. Alan Grayson, D-Fla., said in a statement that it was important for Americans to hear “not only from the proponents of these attacks, but also from the victims.”

Custom-curated news highlights, delivered weekday mornings.