Share story

WASHINGTON — In mid-February, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., went on the NBC’s “Meet the Press” to explain his unhappiness with President Obama’s nominee for defense secretary. A week later, he took to “State of the Union” on CNN to chat about sequestration (bad) and the attack in Benghazi (worse).

In May, he was on “Fox News Sunday,” talking about Middle East politics with Chris Wallace. Last week, McCain, who was in California for his oldest son’s wedding, hit “Face the Nation” on CBS, via satellite, to discuss his trip to Syria.

McCain is not his party’s most recent presidential nominee. He is no longer the highest-ranking Republican on any major congressional committee. And as party spokesmen go, these days he is just as often speaking against congressional Republicans as with them.

Yet on many given Sundays — more than 60 since 2010 — McCain repairs to a television studio in Washington, D.C., to hold forth. On “Face the Nation” alone, McCain has appeared more than any politician in the program’s 60-year history.

This week, save 90% on digital access.

His Sunday ubiquity has set off some grumbling in Washington, D.C., that producers give him too much airtime. It also tends to solidify the impression
that he remains the spokesman for, and titular head of, his party.

“Really?” McCain said with a soupçon of glee when informed of his record-breaking Sunday showiness. “Well, I enjoy them. I find it is the best way to communicate with the American people.”

In many ways, the Sunday-morning talk shows are like ID lanyards and BlackBerrys. While much of the nation has lost interest in them, they hold a big — some would say disproportionate — sway in the nation’s capital.

“What makes a good guest is someone who makes news,” said Wallace, the Fox host. “To make news, you have to be at the center of the news and willing to talk about it in a noncanned way, someone who always comes to the shows ready to play.”

He went on: “I sometimes think to myself, ‘Gee, we’ve had McCain on a lot,’” not to mention Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Dick Durbin, D-Ill. “But the fact of the matter is, they are good guests.”

Good guests become frequent guests. The programs tend to be dominated by a handful of predictably quotable politicians. Others make only rare appearances when a pet issue rears its head. And still others, by choice or by elimination, never make the cut at all.

“I usually go where I’m asked,” said Sen. Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., who has not been on a Sunday talk show in the past few years. “I did Greta the other night,” Isakson pointed out, referring to the Fox News program “On the Record With Greta Van Susteren.”

Isakson, like several other Republicans, says McCain does not serve as a spokesman for them or their party. “We all speak for ourselves,” he said.

Critics of the Sunday programs say the words spoken on them are at once too calculated and overly interpreted, simply by virtue of where they are delivered. “You can go on Charlie Rose midweek and have a long conversation that ends in a game of strip poker and no one will pay attention,” said Philippe Reines, a senior adviser to former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. “You go on a Sunday show, and everyone is looking for the slightest change, a new syllable, some new nuance.”

The prominence of guests with strong points of view can give viewers a false sense of proportion to certain sides of policy debates. This is most clearly the case with McCain, whose advocacy for military intervention in Syria and criticism of the administration’s policies there might create a sense that there is a robust policy debate over the matter when there is not.

Many guests believe the talk shows also contribute to the partisan disharmony in Washington, D.C., though that may be like blaming a speck of pepper for the flavor of a 10-gallon pot of soup. Even the highest-rated programs attract fewer than 2.5 million viewers, a tiny audience by the standards of network television.

“There is a tendency on the Sunday shows to look more toward partisan polarization,” said David Gergen, a senior analyst for CNN who has advised four presidents. “They seek out people who are further out on the spectrum,” Gergen said, adding that “more than one senator” has told him the story of being bumped for a more partisan guest when they expressed moderate positions on issues in pre-interviews, something producers and hosts say is untrue.

“We aren’t looking for someone because of their ideological view,” said Bob Schieffer, chief Washington correspondent for CBS and the moderator of “Face the Nation.” “We are trying to move the story forward.”

Many congressional staff members, when faced with the weekly talk-show requests, apply the Hippocratic oath: First, do no harm. One misstatement or shading can hurt a campaign and damage a career, as Susan Rice, who is the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations and is about to become Obama’s national-security adviser, learned when she went on a series of shows in September to discuss the attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya.

The term “talking points” will now follow her into retirement.

Some of the hosts complain the Obama administration sends out far too few high-level officials, a contention illustrated by Schieffer’s thinly veiled contempt for White House adviser Dan Pfeiffer when he appeared on a recent Sunday to address the scandals that have bedeviled the administration.

“They tend to send out people who don’t seem to have direct knowledge of the story,” Schieffer said, noting that Vice President Joe Biden was a frequent guest when he was a senator but rarely appeared now.

Custom-curated news highlights, delivered weekday mornings.