Obama's nominations of former Sen. Chuck Hagel as defense secretary and White House counterterrorism adviser John Brennan to lead the CIA signal second-term course adjustments at institutions that have been dominated by their lethal assignments during more than a decade of war.
WASHINGTON — President Obama is assembling a national-security team designed for an era of downsized but enduring conflict, a team that will be asked to preside over the return of exhausted American troops and wield power through the targeted use of sanctions, Special Operations forces and drone strikes.
Obama’s nominations of former Sen. Chuck Hagel as defense secretary and White House counterterrorism adviser John Brennan to lead the CIA signal second-term course adjustments at institutions that have been dominated by their lethal assignments during more than a decade of war.
Those adjustments could include returning the CIA’s focus to its core mission of gathering intelligence, even though it is expected to maintain its fleet of armed drones for years. The Pentagon faces an even more aggressive restructuring to balance budget cuts against threats, including China’s ascendant military and emerging al-Qaida affiliates in North Africa and the Middle East.
- Seahawks' Marshawn Lynch announces retirement in his own, unique fashion
- Black Sabbath calls it a night at the Tacoma Dome — for good
- Costco delays credit-card switch
- Seahawks star Marshawn Lynch's tweet during Super Bowl appears to announce retirement
- Seattle’s brash king of pot raking in cash and raising hackles at Uncle Ike’s
Most Read Stories
The nominations also set the stage for confirmation fights driven not only by criticism of Hagel and Brennan but by the foreign-policy approach they represent.
Hagel, a decorated Vietnam War veteran, shares Obama’s aversion to military intervention. White House officials described him as ideally suited to managing the drawdown of U.S. forces in Afghanistan and the shrinking Pentagon budget. But he has attracted fierce criticism from groups that question his support for Israel.
Brennan is a 25-year CIA veteran who has voiced concern over the agency’s paramilitary mission and has imposed tighter controls on targeted killing, even while his White House tenure has been marked by a massive increase in the agency’s drone campaign.
Four years ago, Brennan withdrew from consideration to be CIA director amid questions about his role as a high-ranking CIA official at a time when the agency employed brutal interrogation techniques — a link certain to resurface when he faces a Senate vote.
Both men are known for their strong personalities and strongly held views. Still, associates described them as comfortable fits for an administration that favors covert action — including Predator drone strikes on al-Qaida targets and cyber-sabotage of Iran’s nuclear plants — over conventional force.
In announcing the nominees, Obama said that their agenda would include “ending the war in Afghanistan and caring for those who have borne the battle, and preparing for the full range of threats.”
He also emphasized their experiences in the lower ranks of the institutions they would run, saying both served overseas and understand firsthand “the consequences of decisions that we make in this town.”
Obama avoided one confirmation fight when U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice withdrew from consideration to be secretary of state amid criticism of her role in the aftermath of the attack on the U.S. diplomatic post in Benghazi, Libya.
Instead, Obama turned to a compromise pick, Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass. The former Democratic presidential candidate — a Vietnam veteran, like Hagel — has established relationships with foreign leaders that could help the administration push for tougher sanctions on Iran, expand its pursuit of al-Qaida beyond Yemen and Pakistan, and deal with the Syrian civil war.
Ben Rhodes, deputy national-security adviser for strategic communications, said Obama’s selection of Kerry, Hagel and Brennan reflects a change in foreign-policy priorities for the second term.
Rhodes said all three nominees share Obama’s basic view of the world and America’s place in it, a view that favors multilateral alliances and a reliance on intelligence and lethal technology, holding war as a last resort. “These are three men well suited to that task,” he said.
Brennan has led a White House effort to develop a “playbook” of counterterrorism policies, aiming to set up institutions that can sustain the fight against al-Qaida for another decade or more.
But Obama is also seeking to turn toward other objectives, including new initiatives in Asia and expanded nuclear-nonproliferation work.
Hagel would add a well-known war skeptic to the administration’s national-security team at a time when a potential military confrontation with Iran over its uranium-enrichment efforts looms as one of the gravest security challenges of Obama’s second term.
A former Republican senator from Nebraska, Hagel supported the Iraq invasion in 2003. But he later broke with his party leaders over the war’s management and opposed the 2007 troop surge that, combined with other factors, helped bring a measure of stability to Iraq.
That break in ranks angered many Senate Republicans who will be weighing his nomination.
Hagel has also faced mounting criticism in recent weeks from groups that have depicted him as a wary supporter of Israel. If that opposition solidifies, Obama could face the kind of confirmation fight that prompted him to back away from the Rice nomination.
Hagel would be the first former soldier of enlisted rank, and the first Vietnam veteran, to head the Pentagon.
His background would bolster Obama’s growing emphasis on veterans’ issues as more troops come home.
Karl Inderfurth, an assistant secretary of state in the Clinton administration, said Obama is putting together a second-term Cabinet that would probably “look long and hard, adopt ‘a look before you leap’ approach, before committing U.S. forces and prestige to foreign lands.”
Brennan also faces a potential confirmation fight, and his nomination met immediate opposition from senior lawmakers and civil-liberties groups.
McCain gears up
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said he had “many questions and concerns … especially what role he played in the so-called enhanced interrogation programs while serving at the CIA during the last administration.”
Brennan was chief of staff to then-CIA director George Tenet after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, when the agency set up a network of secret prisons and began using brutal interrogation techniques, including a method of simulated drowning known as “waterboarding.”
Brennan has described himself as a critic of those methods, but former colleagues said they could not recall him raising objections when he was a senior executive at the CIA.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said in an interview Monday that she supports Brennan and thinks he will be confirmed.
As a senior adviser to Obama over the past four years, Brennan has played a direct role in another controversial CIA program, the expanding campaign of drone strikes against al-Qaida targets in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia.
Senior administration officials said Brennan has fought to impose tighter limits on the use of targeted killing. Nevertheless, the pace of attacks has soared.
Of the approximately 390 airstrikes in Pakistan and Yemen over the past decade, more than 340 came under Obama and Brennan, according to the Long War Journal, which tracks drone strikes.