It is likely to be an intense end of the year as Congress and the White House grapple with Bush-era tax cuts set to expire this year and $109 billion in spending reductions due to take effect Jan. 2.
WASHINGTON — President Obama and congressional leaders were optimistic Friday after opening talks aimed at avoiding a tumble over the “fiscal cliff,” offering hints of a compromise that would combine new tax revenue with steep spending cuts.
Their hourlong meeting at the White House kicked off what is likely to be an intense, unpredictable November and December as Congress and the White House grapple with how to deal with Bush-era tax cuts that expire at the end of next month and $109 billion in across-the-board spending reductions due to take effect Jan. 2.
Obama said after Friday’s meeting that they had agreed to work together to find a solution that “includes both revenues and cuts in spending.” The challenge, he said, was to cooperate, “work together, find some common ground, make some tough compromises.”
House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., who have been loath to consider tax increases as part of a solution to tame the deficit, said after the closed-door meeting that Republicans might consider taxes if they were accompanied by significant spending reductions.
- Job cuts planned as Boeing hunkers down to compete with Airbus, consider new plane
- Female tiger killed by mating partner at Sacramento Zoo
- Amid Zika fears, local family shares the reality of microcephaly
- With Marshawn Lynch retired, what will Seahawks do with money they save?
- Police: Ohio newborn appears to have died from dog bite
Most Read Stories
“We are prepared to put revenue on the table, provided we fix the real problem,” McConnell said, adding that most of his caucus thinks “we’re in the dilemma we’re in not because we taxed too little, but because we spent too much.”
Back at the Capitol, the mood among Congress’ rank and file was largely conciliatory. But there was a sharp reminder that getting a deal through the lame-duck session would mean a struggle with each party’s ideological wing, where some members dug in Friday.
“This was a photo-op for the president. So be it,” said Rep. Tom Price, R-Ga., a leading conservative.
Among liberal Democrats, Rep. Jim McGovern of Massachusetts warned “it would be foolish to just assume we’re to go along with everything. We’re not a cheap date.”
Conservatives insist tax rates remain the same or go lower.
“We got a loud and clear message from the voters,” said Rep. Steve Scalise, of Louisiana, the incoming chairman of the Republican Study Committee, the House’s conservative caucus. “The president only defines revenue as raising taxes. We see revenue coming from getting the economy moving again.”
Boehner was more circumspect, saying Republicans put revenue on the table to demonstrate their seriousness about a solution. Boehner told Obama that without significant tax and entitlement changes, lawmakers will be unable to control the burgeoning budget deficit.
The speaker suggested tax and entitlement issues may be too complex to solve in a lame-duck session. Negotiators should settle on long-term revenue targets for tax revisions, he proposed, as well as goals for savings from entitlement programs, such as Medicare.
Liberals said they were wary of big spending cuts, particularly those that hurt the poor or significantly cut Medicare.
Both sides in the talks have been open to raising the eligibility age for most Medicare recipients from age 65 to 67, but Rep. Peter Welch, D-Vt., cautioned: “This is where the talks are going to get very difficult. There’s going to be a desire to shift the burden to beneficiaries.” The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has said raising the eligibility age would save about $148 billion over 10 years.
Obama and lawmakers agreed staffers would begin working on a framework to be presented to the White House and lawmakers after the Thanksgiving holiday. The president was to leave Saturday on a four-day trip to Asia.