New rules relax long-standing limits on what the National Security Agency may do with the information gathered by its most powerful surveillance operations.
In its final days, the Obama administration has expanded the power of the National Security Agency (NSA) to share globally intercepted personal communications with the government’s 16 other intelligence agencies before applying privacy protections.
The new rules significantly relax long-standing limits on what the NSA may do with the information gathered by its most powerful surveillance operations, which are largely unregulated by U.S. wiretapping laws. These include collecting satellite transmissions, phone calls and emails that cross network switches abroad, and messages between people abroad that cross domestic network switches.
The change means that far more officials will be searching through raw data. Essentially, the government is reducing the risk the NSA will fail to recognize that a piece of information would be valuable to another agency, but increasing the risk that officials will see private information about innocent people.
Attorney General Loretta Lynch signed the new rules, permitting the NSA to disseminate “raw signals intelligence information,” Jan. 3, after the director of national intelligence, James Clapper, signed them Dec. 15, according to a 23-page, largely declassified copy of the procedures.
Most Read Stories
- Foreign buyers drop off as Seattle housing market hits hottest tempo since 2006 bubble
- What drivers can and cannot do under Washington state's new distracted-driving law
- ‘A painful and frustrating experience’: Horizon Air scheduling havoc will continue into the fall
- Seattle police after organizer cancels popular Magnuson Park movie nights: ‘The park is safe’
- Dining on roadkill: Washington residents gather 1,600 deer, elk in law's first year VIEW
Previously, the NSA filtered information before sharing intercepted communications with another agency, like the CIA or the intelligence branches of the FBI and the Drug Enforcement Administration. The NSA’s analysts passed on only information they deemed pertinent, screening out the identities of innocent people and irrelevant personal information.
Now, other intelligence agencies will be able to search directly through raw repositories of communications intercepted by the NSA and then apply such rules for “minimizing” privacy intrusions.
“This is not expanding the substantive ability of law enforcement to get access to signals intelligence,” said Robert Litt, the general counsel to Clapper. “It is simply widening the aperture for a larger number of analysts, who will be bound by the existing rules.”
Patrick Toomey, a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), called the move an erosion of rules intended to protect the privacy of Americans when their messages are caught by the NSA’s powerful global collection methods. He noted that domestic internet data was often routed or stored abroad, where it may get vacuumed up without court oversight.
“Rather than dramatically expanding government access to so much personal data, we need much stronger rules to protect the privacy of Americans,” Toomey said. “Seventeen different government agencies shouldn’t be rooting through Americans’ emails with family members, friends and colleagues, all without ever obtaining a warrant.”
The NSA has been required to apply similar privacy protections to foreigners’ information since early 2014, an unprecedented step that President Obama took after the disclosures of NSA documents by former intelligence contractor Edward Snowden. The other intelligence agencies will now have to follow those rules, too.
Under the new system, agencies will ask the NSA for access to specific surveillance feeds, making the case that they contain information relevant and useful to their missions. The NSA will grant requests it deems reasonable after considering factors such as whether large amounts of Americans’ private information might be included and, if so, how damaging or embarrassing it would be if that information were “improperly used or disclosed.”
The move is part of a broader trend of tearing down bureaucratic barriers to sharing intelligence among agencies that dates back to the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
In 2002, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court secretly began permitting the NSA, the FBI and the CIA to share raw intercepts gathered domestically under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).
After Congress enacted the FISA Amendments Act — which legalized warrantless surveillance on domestic soil so long as the target is a foreigner abroad, even when the target is communicating with an American — the court permitted raw sharing of emails acquired under that program, too.
In July 2008, the same month Congress passed the FISA Amendments Act, President George W. Bush modified Executive Order 12333, which sets rules for surveillance that domestic wiretapping statutes do not address, including techniques that vacuum up vast amounts of content without targeting anybody.
After the revision, Executive Order 12333 said the NSA could share the raw fruits of such surveillance after the director of national intelligence and the attorney general, coordinating with the defense secretary, agreed on procedures. It took eight years to develop those rules.