In new guidelines, the Obama administration says doctors and hospitals cannot require patients to state a reason for requesting their health records and cannot deny access out of a concern that patients might be upset by the information.
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration is tearing down barriers that make it difficult for patients to get access to their own medical records, telling doctors and hospitals that in most cases they must provide copies of these records within 30 days of receiving a request.
In theory, patients have long had a right to obtain copies of their records, but federal officials say they receive large numbers of complaints from consumers frustrated in trying to exercise that right.
In new guidelines, issued this month, the administration says doctors and hospitals cannot require patients to state a reason for requesting their records, and cannot deny access out of a general concern that patients might be upset by the information.
“Based on recent studies and our own enforcement experience, far too often individuals face obstacles to accessing their health information,” said Jocelyn Samuels, director of the Office for Civil Rights at the Department of Health and Human Services, which enforces federal health-privacy standards. “This must change.”
Most Read Stories
- What drivers can and cannot do under Washington state's new distracted-driving law
- Federal judge: ‘The citizens of Seattle are not going to pay blackmail for constitutional policing’
- '450 square feet of fear': Renter dreads rising cost for Fremont studio apartment | Seattle Sketcher
- Man shot at Seattle's Golden Gardens Park amid apparent gunfight
- Pac-12 football preview: Washington an overwhelming favorite in the North
When patients can see their medical records, the administration said, it is easier for them to participate in their health care. They can, for example, review what they were told by their doctors and, perhaps, consider other options for care.
Christopher Moore of Alpharetta, Ga., said he had great difficulty obtaining hospital records for his 4-year-old son, Oliver, who has a rare genetic disorder and has seen at least eight specialists in Atlanta, Cincinnati and Boston.
“The hospital in Atlanta was very slow to respond,” Moore said. “We had to escalate our request to the hospital leadership to get the records.”
Moore said insurers had spent $800,000 on care for his son, generating several thousand pages of medical records.
“Some doctors seem to believe that medical records are intended only for doctor-to-doctor communication and that patients would not understand those records,” Moore said. “We want the records so we have control over them, so we can provide them to any doctor who sees our son.”
Under the new guidelines, a health-care provider cannot require patients to pick up their records in person if they ask that the records be sent by mail or email. A health-care provider cannot deny a request for access to health information because a patient has failed to pay medical bills. A doctor or a hospital may charge a fee to cover the cost of copying, but cannot charge for the cost of searching for data and retrieving it.
Dr. Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health, said consumers needed access to their records so they could “take more control over decisions regarding their health,” follow treatment plans and correct errors in the files.
In addition, Collins said, some people want access to their records so they can contribute information to biomedical research projects such as President Obama’s “precision medicine” initiative.
Researchers working on the project will collect data on the health, genetic characteristics and lifestyle habits of a million or more volunteers.
The same rules that protect the privacy of medical records also give patients a right to see a broad array of health information about themselves. The rules were issued under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.
Doctors and hospitals are supposed to provide consumers with access to personal health information within 30 days and, in some cases, can extend the deadline by 30 days. But, the administration said, most requests should be fulfilled in less than 30 days.
Melinda Hatton, a senior vice president of the American Hospital Association, said the guidelines were “a helpful reminder.” Hospitals, she said, “strongly support patients’ access to their medical records,” and many have Web portals that let patients view information about their care.
But Deven McGraw, a deputy director of the Office for Civil Rights, said complaints about access to medical records were among the top five issues investigated by her agency.
Under the rules, doctors and hospitals do not have to disclose psychotherapy notes that are kept separate from the rest of a patient’s medical record.
Health-care providers may also deny requests if the disclosure of personal health information is “reasonably likely to endanger the life or physical safety” of a patient or another person. Thus, certain information might be denied to a suicidal patient.
But, the administration said, this exception is to be narrowly construed.