GENEVA — A new and legally binding international treaty to reduce harmful emissions of mercury was adopted Saturday by more than 140 nations, capping four years of negotiations but stopping short of some of the tougher measures proponents had envisioned.
The new accord aims to cut mercury pollution from mining, utility plants and a variety of products and industrial processes, by setting enforceable limits and encouraging shifts to alternatives in which mercury is not used, released or emitted.
Mercury, known to be a poison for centuries, is a natural element that cannot be created or destroyed. It is released into the air, water and land from small-scale artisanal gold mining, coal-powered plants and from discarded electronic or consumer products, such as electrical switches, thermostats and dental amalgam fillings. Mercury compound goes into batteries, paints and skin-lightening creams.
Because it concentrates and accumulates in fish and goes up the food chain, mercury poses the greatest risk of nerve damage to pregnant women, women of childbearing age and young children. The World Health Organization has said there are no safe limits for the consumption of mercury and its compounds, which can cause brain and kidney damage, memory loss and language impairment.
- A couple thoughts on Fred Jackson, Kam Chancellor and the Seahawks
- Haggen sues Albertsons for $1 billion over big grocery deal
- UW, Alaska Airlines agree to naming-rights deal for Husky Stadium's field
- After McKinley, it’s time to consider renaming Rainier
- Huskies’ colors for opener are purple, green
Most Read Stories
A decade ago, Switzerland and Norway began pushing for an international treaty to limit mercury emissions, a process that culminated in the adoption of the accord Saturday.
But the treaty only requires that nations with artisanal and small-scale gold-mining operations, one of the biggest sources of mercury releases, draw up national plans to reduce and — if possible — eliminate the use of mercury in such operations. The deal asks that the plans be done within three years of the treaty entering force.
Governments also approved exceptions for some uses, such as large measuring devices for which there are no mercury-free alternatives; vaccines where mercury is used as a preservative; and products used in religious or traditional activities.
The U.N. Environment Program said the treaty will be signed this year in the southern Japanese city of Minamata, for which it is to be named. After that, 50 nations must ratify it before it comes into force, which officials predicted would happen in three to four years.
So-called Minamata disease, a severe neurological disorder caused by mercury poisoning, was discovered in the late 1950s because of methylmercury escaping from the city’s industrial wastewater. The illness, which sickened people who ate contaminated fish, killed hundreds and crippled many more. Some 12,000 people have demanded compensation from Japan’s government.
In the past 100 years, mercury found in the top 100 yards of the world’s oceans has doubled, and concentrations in waters deeper than that have gone up by 25 percent, the U.N. Environment Program says, while rivers and lakes contain an estimated 260 metric tons of mercury that was previously held in soils.
The treaty was originally blocked by powers such as the United States, but President Obama’s reversal of the U.S. position in 2009 helped propel momentum for its adoption. China and India also played key roles in ensuring its passage; Asia accounts for just under half of all global mercury releases.
Some supporters of a new mercury treaty said they were not satisfied with the agreement. Joe DiGangi, a science adviser with advocacy group IPEN, said that while the treaty is “a first step,” it is not tough enough to achieve its aim of reducing overall emissions. For example, he said, there is no requirement that each country create a national plan for how it will reduce mercury emissions.