It's becoming known as the war of the fatwas: the dizzying exchange of proclamations between Islamic moderates and extremists on what it...
ATHENS, Greece — It’s becoming known as the war of the fatwas: the dizzying exchange of proclamations between Islamic moderates and extremists on what it means to be Muslim. The duels have been waged everywhere from pamphlets to cyberspace.
Now some Muslim leaders seek to shift tactics against radicals. Their hope rests in one of Islam’s most elemental questions: Who has the real authority to make religious rulings and other interpretations of the faith?
Proposals to sharply control the issuing of fatwas — the nonbinding edicts on Muslim life, law and duties — are still little more than loose concepts and would require potentially stormy challenges to Islam’s traditions of decentralized leadership.
But there are some influential backers such as Jordan’s King Abdullah II. They argue that bold changes are needed in Islam’s hierarchy to isolate radical clerics and discredit terrorist leaders, including Osama bin Laden, who have used self-styled religious decrees to justify their views and actions.
- UW, Alaska Airlines agree to naming-rights deal for Husky Stadium's field
- Wife upset dad disappointed in baby's gender
- A couple thoughts on Fred Jackson, Kam Chancellor and the Seahawks
- Kentucky clerks to license marriages as their boss is jailed
- Macy’s proposing changes to downtown Seattle store
Most Read Stories
Abdullah, who brought his anti-terrorism message to Athens last week, has appealed for moderate Muslims to take decisive control over fatwas and religious guidance. In early December, Abdullah told the 56-member Organization of the Islamic Conference that failure to establish a clear framework to interpret Islam leaves the door open for radicals to strengthen their ranks.
The summit in Mecca, Saudi Arabia — Islam’s holiest site — wrapped up with a statement reinforcing that only “those who are authorized” can issue fatwas. The monarchs, prime ministers and other delegates, however, could reach little common ground on a proposal to give a single body of Islamic law experts greater oversight of all fatwas covering the Muslim world.
It was a sample of the huge religious and political complications that stalk any efforts to change the centuries-old fatwa practices.
Fatwas and radical demands
What’s a fatwa? A fatwa is an opinion by an expert or group of experts in Islamic jurisprudence. They cover the gamut of public and personal life for Muslims. Fatwas are nonbinding by tradition but can take on added strength in places governed by Islamic law.
Calls for violence: Osama bin Laden and others have issued statements they call fatwas that support terrorism and violence. But mainstream Islamic scholars dismiss these proclamations as lacking any theological foundations.
Seeking controls: Some Muslim leaders have urged for fatwa powers to be consolidated under a single body of Islamic law scholars. The proposals, however, go against Islam’s traditions of decentralized authority.
Islamic scholars say a change would require a fundamental shift away from Islam’s traditions that spread religious authority far and wide rather than under a single leader or institution. Some powerful centers of Islamic learning, such as Egypt’s Al-Azhar University, also resist changes that could diminish their theological voice.
Ask Imam Online: www.islam.tc/ask-imam
“Religious authority is in the eyes of the beholder and not anywhere else,” said Abdullahi An-Na’im, an expert in Islamic law at Emory University in Atlanta. “This reality has not changed in 15 centuries of history, and will not change now.”
But now there’s the Internet and other ways to spread messages to mass audiences — which some commentators have dubbed “the war of the fatwas.”
One of the most infamous salvos was the February 1998 one in which bin Laden and his followers called on Muslims to “kill the Americans and their allies.” It’s been blamed for inspiring some of the most staggering terrorist strikes, including the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
Other extremists increasingly have followed suit with fatwa-style declarations of their own — including statements attributed to terrorist chief Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the alleged mastermind of the Nov. 9 hotel bombings in Amman, Jordan, that killed 60 people.
Moderate clerics initially were slow to react to the radical fatwas. But now there’s a potent counterattack.
In March, Spain’s Muslim leaders issued a fatwa condemning al-Qaida on the anniversary of the 2004 train bombings that claimed 191 lives. A similar anti-terrorist fatwa was made by Britain’s largest Sunni Muslim group after the July attacks that killed 52 commuters.
Jordan announced in December it will prosecute clerics who promote violence or issue fatwas without state permission, becoming the latest Muslim nation seeking to muzzle radical Islam.
“The fatwa, unfortunately, has become a tool of terrorists,” said Abdulssalam Al-Abbadi, Jordan’s former religious-affairs minister. “We cannot keep having two versions of Islam: the correct and moderate views and the violent and extremists views. It’s tearing apart the faith.”
Many Westerners first learned of fatwas through the 1989 decree by the founder of Iran’s Islamic Revolution, the late Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, to kill British author Salman Rushdie for perceived insults to Islam in his book “The Satanic Verses.” But mainstream fatwas are not intended as mandates and rarely have anything to do with violence.
They are essentially opinions from Islamic scholars covering everything from proper conduct during religious pilgrimages to family relationships and dating. One popular Web site — “Ask Imam Online” — even gets down to questions such as whether it’s permissible for women to pluck their eyebrows. The reply was yes.
Fatwas, however, are not binding, and views on the same subject can vary. They gain force from consensus among experts in Islamic law and traditions. Attempts to establish a single authority for fatwas would likely meet with extreme resistance, some Islamic theologians predict.
“It’s impossible,” said Ashirbek Muminov, a researcher on Islam at the Kazakh Oriental Studies Institute in Almaty, Kazakhstan.
It goes beyond fighting ancient traditions, he added. Many Muslims — particularly in former Soviet republics — will distrust “official” imams and others given oversight powers, he said.
The established view is that fatwas can come only from those grounded in Islamic jurisprudence, known as “fiqh.”
The struggle for moderate Muslims is to raise somehow the “serious issue … that the so-called fatwas of radical Islamists shouldn’t be taken as authoritative,” said James Turner Johnson, a professor of religion at Rutgers University.
“But I don’t see the radicals giving up the practice of issuing their own fatwas,” he added. “Doing so wraps their message in a familiar religious form and gives it at least a superficial authority. It tends to establish them as the ‘real’ leadership of Muslims.”
Associated Press writers Salah Nasrawi in Cairo, Egypt, and Bagila Bukharbayeva in Almaty, Kazakhstan, contributed to this report.