NEW YORK — A week bracketed by op-ed letters of accusation and denial of child molestation left little clarity and scant hope for resolution in a bitter saga that has haunted Woody Allen and the Farrow family for more than two decades.
The back-and-forth between Allen and one of his adopted daughters, Dylan Farrow, breathed new fire into a long dormant scandal, but what happens next is uncertain, with the possibility of legal recourse and continued scrutiny.
Dylan Farrow, in her most detailed account, alleged in an open letter published Feb. 1 by The New York Times that Allen “sexual assaulted” her when she was 7 at the Farrows’ Connecticut home, renewing a charge against the director that was first leveled in 1992.
Allen responded in a letter posted online late Friday by The New York Times that insisted “of course I did not molest Dylan.” He instead claimed the young Dylan had been coerced and misled by her mother, Mia Farrow. The two acrimoniously separated after Farrow discovered Allen was having an affair with her adopted daughter Soon-Yi Previn, who was 19 or 21 at the time. (Her date of birth is uncertain.)
- Amazon.com just tip of Seattle boom
- Boeing retools Renton plant for 737's big ramp-up
- 14 million spilled bees on I-5: 'Everybody's been stung'
- Nelson Cruz drives in five, including winning run
- Aaron Hernandez: A $40 million murderer
Most Read Stories
“I loved (Dylan) and hope one day she will grasp how she has been cheated out of having a loving father and exploited by a mother more interested in her own festering anger than her daughter’s well-being,” said Allen, who married Previn in 1997 and has two adopted daughters with her.
Mia Farrow had yet to comment on Allen’s letter Saturday.
Allen ended his letter by declaring it would be his “final word on this entire matter.”
But the rampant debate sparked by Dylan Farrow’s accusation will likely continue to stir questions over the alleged molestation, how claims of sexual assault are publicly weighed and the legacy of Allen’s acclaimed work as a filmmaker.
Filing criminal charges would be difficult for Farrow. In Connecticut, Farrow had until age 20 to file charges. (She is now 28, married and living in Florida.) In 2002, Connecticut extended the cutoff to age 48, but that only covers crimes since the change. Exceptions can be made for the most serious sexual crimes.
Connecticut state prosecutor Frank Maco, who investigated the charges in 1993 but is now retired, has said he thinks the statute of limitations ran out years ago.
Dylan Farrow could file a civil suit against Allen. Though a suit would offer the opportunity to retry the case in civil court, it would ensure a drawn-out, public battle that would be taxing for all involved.
The history of the case is clouded by a 1993 investigation that was full of contradictions. Allen wasn’t charged and a team of child-abuse specialists from the Yale-New Haven Hospital brought into the case by prosecutors concluded Dylan had not been molested. But Maco claimed there was “probable cause” for charging him. In the custody battle, Judge Elliott Wilk concluded Allen’s behavior with Dylan was “grossly inappropriate and that measures must be taken to protect her.”
A disciplinary panel found that Maco may have prejudiced the custody battle by making an accusation without formal charges.
Maco, meanwhile, challenged Allen’s statement in the op-ed letter that he “very willingly” took a lie-detector test. He said Allen refused a request to take a polygraph from the Connecticut State Police and the test he took was administered privately.
Maco also said he was “incensed” at Allen’s letter, which said the district attorney had been “champing at the bit to prosecute a celebrity case.”
Even without further legal action, the public eye in which Allen and the Farrows operate will keep the matter in the headlines.
Ronan Farrow, 26, the son of Allen and Mia Farrow (though she has said Frank Sinatra could be the father), will start hosting his own show on MSNBC on Feb. 24. (Ronan and Dylan’s brother Moses, 36, has insisted Allen never molested Dylan.)
Allen’s latest film, “Blue Jasmine,” is nominated for three Academy Awards. Though Allen, long an award-show absentee, won’t be at the March 2 Oscars, he could win his fifth Oscar for the screenplay to “Blue Jasmine.” The film’s star, Cate Blanchett, is considered the front-runner for best actress.
It was the Golden Globes’ recent honoring of Allen for its Cecil B. DeMille lifetime achievement award that precipitated Dylan Farrow’s op-ed letter, which was largely aimed at the movie industry and fans of Allen for turning a blind eye to the director’s alleged molestation.
But if the endgame of the situation is unclear, Dylan Farrow has suggested she’s accomplished her goal. “If speaking out about my experience can help others stand up to their tormentors, it will be worth the pain and suffering my father continues to inflict on me,” Farrow said in a statement after Allen’s op-ed. “I won’t let the truth be buried and I won’t be silenced.”