Many analysts believe Pelosi's political career could end Tuesday.
WASHINGTON — The speaker’s lobby and its hallways just off the House chamber are hung with portraits of all 51 former speakers: each male, each long gone, some famous, most forgotten: Henry Clay and Joseph Cannon, Tom Foley and Jim Wright, Newt Gingrich and Dennis Hastert.
Hanging over Tuesday’s election is a big question: Will the first woman, San Francisco’s Nancy Pelosi, join that gallery?
Pelosi’s allies, perhaps offering a clue to her thinking, cite the example of legendary Texas Democrat Sam Rayburn, who twice lost the majority but came back as speaker a record three times from 1940 until his death in 1961.
If this is the path Pelosi, 70, wants to follow — seeking election as minority leader if Democrats lose the House — it would be a radical break with recent tradition. Gingrich resigned soon after the GOP lost five seats — but not the majority — in the 1998 midterm elections. Hastert gave up his leadership role after Republicans lost their majority in the 2006 elections and resigned his seat a year later.
- 4 Mount Rainier High teens charged in alleged gang rape on field trip
- How opera, QVC and his ‘Dirty Jobs’ gig prepared Mike Rowe for the Seattle stage
- Donate to a charity? IRS sets rules for taking deductions
- Justice Antonin Scalia dead at 79
- Examining if the Seahawks would be a good fit for Matt Forte
Most Read Stories
Many analysts believe Pelosi’s political career could end Tuesday. Her national popularity is in the basement. She has become a symbol of Democratic excesses, much like Gingrich once was for Republicans, a radioactive “San Francisco liberal” from whom moderate Democrats in marginal districts are fleeing.
“Chances are that she would not stay in the House; she would resign,” said James Thurber, director of the Center for Congressional and Presidential Studies at American University. A special election would be called in San Francisco, and Democrats would clear the way for a “new generation that’s stepping up and has the energy and focus to be in the minority,” he said.
That is how Pelosi fought her way into the leadership, becoming minority leader in 2002 and winning the speakership in 2006 after demolishing the GOP majority of 12 years.
Pelosi is sticking by her insistence that Democrats will keep their majority. She has made it clear that she intends to remain speaker. What Pelosi has not said is whether she would run for the leadership in the minority.
The Rayburn analogy is flawed, historians said. In 1946 and 1952, two brief interludes of GOP control were viewed at the time as aberrations resulting from President Truman’s unpopularity and President Eisenhower’s landslide. Today’s conditions are quite different, said Claremont McKenna College political scientist Jack Pitney.
Embattled Democrats running away from Pelosi “are obviously getting polling data that indicates any association with her is politically dangerous,” Pitney said, “and when that happens, a leader’s hold on power is in jeopardy.”
The hard climb back to a majority would require recruiting, as Pelosi once did, of the very centrists and conservatives who now consider her an albatross.
Still, there is a path for Pelosi to hang on to the leadership of her party.
“She’s going to have to fight for it, but it’s not impossible,” said Bruce Cain, a political scientist at the University of California, Berkeley.
Pelosi has at least two things in her favor: an astonishing fundraising prowess and the loyalty of a shrunken but more liberal Democratic caucus that blames President Obama as much as her for the party’s state. Liberals credit Pelosi with pressuring Obama when he was inclined to cave.
Add a third: Pelosi’s legislative accomplishments are beyond dispute: a health-care overhaul, financial-market regulation, the fiscal stimulus and a host of other laws that, regardless of popularity, have made her among the most effective speakers in modern history.
Cain said former California Assembly Speaker Willie Brown remained in power even in the minority. “There are a lot of examples where a very smart leader who is absolutely central to the party’s operation” can stay in power, Cain said, especially if the leader can raise money.
Since entering the Democratic leadership in 2002, Pelosi has raised more than $222 million for Democrats — $57.2 million in this campaign cycle alone. No one in the House comes close, including rising Democratic star Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., who has raised $19.5 million.
Pelosi rules her caucus, and aside from a handful of terrified Democrats in squishy districts who now are promising never to vote for her again, there has been nary a whisper of revolt. To see how odd this is, look at the Senate, where Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., and Dick Durbin, D-Ill., openly are jockeying to replace Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid if he loses his Nevada seat.
Pelosi began her career in California as a Democratic money machine, the paramount prerequisite for being a party leader. She has not slowed since.
“That is always a big, big thing. That is a huge plus in her column,” said GOP consultant Ford O’Connell, who directed rural outreach for Republican Sen. John McCain’s presidential bid in 2008.
The endangered Democrats who have been most adamant in their vows to vote for a new leader are precisely those most likely to be voted out of office, rendering their threats useless.
Those who remain will be loyal liberals in safe districts, few safer than Bay Area Democrats such as George Miller and Anna Eshoo at the core of Pelosi’s support.
Even Pelosi detractors see a way for her to survive.
O’Connell warned that this election is not a “wave” for Republicans but a “tempest” that holds equal peril for the GOP.
“This is like a ship that’s fallen off of its mooring, and it’s just spinning around,” O’Connell said. “Once this Republican Congress takes over, they’re not going to have more than 100 days before people start taking shots at them if they don’t see an improvement in the economy.
“It’s a tough choice, but I wouldn’t retire if I were her,” he added. “Two years is a political lifetime.”