President Obama says the Gulf of Mexico oil spill is the "worst environmental disaster America has ever faced." Is he right?
The Gulf of Mexico oil spill is the “worst environmental disaster America has ever faced,” according to President Obama. Those were bold words in a country whose past is littered with oil spills, explosions, toxic dumps, extinctions and at least one river on fire.
So, was he right?
Historians, predictably, say that depends on what he meant by “worst” and “disaster.” The Dust Bowl of the 1930s caused more social upheaval. The Exxon Valdez spill had a higher wildlife death toll. The pesticide DDT affected a wider swath of the country.
- Anonymous donor pays off landslide victim's $360K mortgage
- Could Chris Polk be a fit for the Seahawks?
- Jesse Jones is back: Seattle's superhero consumer reporter is now at KIRO 7
- This USB cable finally could be connector for long haul
- Fire destroys Bellevue auto showroom, dozens of cars
Most Read Stories
But merely asking the question reveals a depressing truth about the current catastrophe. It has a great deal in common with the others: private interests that took risks in search of a payoff; a government that wasn’t trying hard enough to stop them.
The Deepwater Horizon rig sank on the 40th anniversary of Earth Day. That was a special irony: It happened on a day that promised that Americans had learned from their mistakes.
“It does just raise the question of, ‘How much have we really learned?’ ” said Andy Kirk, a history professor at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas.
Tuesday marks the 63rd day since the April 20 explosion on the drilling rig, which killed 11 workers.
According to government estimates, the BP well has released between 68 million and 126 million gallons of oil — at least six times the Valdez spill in 1989. As of Monday, oil was affecting 174 miles of the Gulf Coast, more than double the number from last week.
BP officials said Monday they were capturing 966,000 gallons a day, as much as 65 percent of the flow, using a “cap” that fits over the well. But the relief wells that finally could plug the thing are weeks from completion.
A compelling case
White House officials declined Monday to explain Obama’s rationale for deciding this disaster is worse than the others.
In interviews, however, some historians and environmentalists said they could build a compelling case that it is.
“It’s on the scale of an ecosystem, and it’s on the scale of an economy, that the impacts will be felt,” said Mike Daulton of the National Audubon Society. He said no other one-time event — no single spill, explosion or dumping case — could match the reach of the spill’s impact, from Louisiana to the Florida Panhandle. “This is on the front doorstep of America.”
But American history brims with other, more long-term catastrophes: From the perspective of a bison or a (now-extinct) passenger pigeon, the whole thing might look like one long disaster.
In the Dust Bowl years of the 1930s, for instance, a drought was made worse by human mistakes. Farmers had plowed up grassland to take advantage of high grain prices. When prices dropped, the fields were abandoned, with no roots to hold soil in place.
Vast dust storms, big enough to reach Washington, D.C., were the result, along with wide-scale migration from the region.
“I think the Dust Bowl is a far more catastrophic example for — not the environment — but for the people involved, and for the whole culture of the American Southwest,” said Oliver Houck, a law professor who studies environmental history at Tulane University in New Orleans. “The Southwest has never recovered from the Dust Bowl and never will.”
Another candidate for worst environmental disaster is the use of DDT, a pesticide that thinned eggshells and was blamed for the decline of such birds as bald eagles and brown pelicans. The Valdez spill, although smaller in volume, happened close to a shoreline packed with wildlife: 35,000 dead birds were found, compared with the 957 reported in the Gulf.
In the 1960s, the modern environmental movement was sparked partly by two events that — set against this grim history — barely look like disasters at all. An oil spill off Santa Barbara, Calif., in 1969 was less than 5 percent the size of the current one. And the fire on the Cuyahoga River in Cleveland, 41 years ago Tuesday, was spectacular but contained to one stretch of one river.
In subsequent years, the United States passed rules to protect clean air, clean water and endangered species. It helped solve the hole in the ozone layer. It created the modern era of environmental-impact statements, hybrid cars and recycled toilet paper.
Which is why the current spill is such a depressing lesson for historians.
It shows that people — at least those who were running the well and overseeing its safety — might be repeating the mistake of underestimating risks to the environment.
“Our default mode in looking at the world is: ‘How can we make money from it?’ And so that was the lure of the farmers who helped create the conditions that led to the Dust Bowl. It’s true of BP,” said Adam Rome, a professor at Pennsylvania State University. “If you think that way, you’re going to be willfully blind to the costs that you don’t pay,” he said, until there’s a disaster.
At the American Petroleum Institute, a trade group, economist John Felmy disputed the idea that his industry hadn’t learned from history. Felmy said oil companies spend billions of dollars to protect the environment, and oil spills have been on the decline for years.
“Think about the people who have driven their entire lives without a car accident and then have one,” Felmy said, likening those drivers to the oil industry.
He said it is too soon to pass judgment on the industry for the Gulf spill: “Before we make any major, sweeping conclusions, let’s really understand what happened.”
The debate over this disaster’s lessons, and its place in history, becomes less theoretical as you get closer to the Gulf. How bad is it? In New Orleans this week, the answer was: bad enough.
“They say if you buy high, sell high. It doesn’t work,” said Nga Vu, who owns a restaurant called Capt. Sal’s Seafood & Chicken.
She said she pays more for local shrimp, as sections of the Gulf have closed to fishing. But customers aren’t coming to pay her higher prices.
“They say this could last forever,” Vu said in a restaurant that was nearly empty. “I think this is real bad.”
Information from The Associated Press is included in this report.