The battle in Kiev is, in large part, a fight for the country’s economic future — for better jobs and prosperity.
Ukraine’s protesters wanted to pry their country away from Russian influence and move closer to the European Union (EU). A look at neighboring Poland, which did that, suggests why.
The two countries emerged from the collapse of the Soviet Union two decades ago in roughly similar economic shape. But Poland joined the EU and focused on reforms and investment — and by one measure is three times richer than Ukraine.
Ukraine, on the other hand, sank in a post-Soviet swamp of corruption, bad government and shortsighted reliance on cheap gas from Russia.
- 2 killed, thousands lose power in Seattle-area windstorm
- Mariners fire general manager Jack Zduriencik
- Now comes the hard part for the Mariners: Hiring Jack Zduriencik’s replacement
- Wet weekend ahead, with high winds and heavy rain expected
- Jack Zduriencik’s M’s legacy: More than 3 dozen departed managers, coaches, scouts, staffers
Most Read Stories
Russia has good reason to be interested in Ukraine. Its Black Sea naval fleet is based there, and crucial pipelines carry Russian natural gas to customers in Europe.
Per capita economic output is about $7,300, even adjusted for the lower cost of living there, compared to $22,200 in Poland and about $51,700 in the U.S. Ukraine ranks 137th worldwide, behind El Salvador, Namibia and Guyana.
Protests began in November after President Viktor Yanukovych backed out of signing an agreement with the EU that would have brought the economy closer in line with European standards.
After violent protests resulted in scores of deaths, the government and the opposition signed an agreement Friday. But it is unclear whether it will succeed in providing a stable government that can heal the rifts and improve the economy.
It didn’t have to be this way, experts say. Ukraine has a large potential consumer market, with 46 million people, an educated workforce and a rich potential export market next door in the EU. It has a significant industrial base and good natural resources, in particular rich farmland.
How did things go so wrong? Here are the main reasons.
Old industry: Ukraine did little to move away from Soviet-era industries producing commodities such as steel, metals and chemicals. Former communist state companies, often privatized to politically connected figures, relied on cheap gas from Russia and growing demand from the world economy for their raw materials.
That helped Ukraine’s economy grow rapidly from 2000 to 2008, but reduced pressure to modernize.
When the world economy fell into a crisis in 2008, demand for Ukraine’s raw materials plunged. In 2009, Russia significantly raised the price of its gas supplies, further pulling the rug from underneath the country’s export industries.
Gas follies: Ukraine’s state gas company, Naftogaz, charges customers about 20 percent of what it pays for imported Russian gas. That means the government spends about 7.5 percent of the entire economy’s output each year on a massive home-heating subsidy aimed at keeping voters happy. That results in large budget deficits that the government must borrow to cover.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) tried to help Ukraine through its post-crisis troubles, with loan packages in 2008 and 2010. Each time, the IMF turned off the money tap after Ukraine refused to follow policy requirements, including raising gas prices or cutting back sufficiently on generous government salaries and pensions.
Corruption: A recent World Bank study of the economy cited “pervasive” corruption as a major factor holding back the economy. At street level, businesses are subjected to arbitrary treatment by officials and demands for bribes. Higher up, there is widespread public skepticism over the fortunes amassed by the connected, known as oligarchs. In particular, attention has focused on the career of Yanukovych’s son Oleksandr, a dentist who according to Forbes Ukraine has amassed a $510 million fortune through various business enterprises.
Ukraine ranked 144 out of 175 countries in the 2013 corruption-perception index compiled by Transparency International, an anti-corruption group, behind Papua New Guinea, Nigeria and Iran.
Red tape: Business advocates say owners sometimes prefer paying bribes to obeying regulations and taxes that are so complicated and burdensome that they would be out of business if they complied. The country’s complex business-tax laws require 390 hours a year to comply with and take 54.9 percent of profits. That put Ukraine 164th of 189 countries in ease of paying taxes in a World Bank survey.
Broken finances: Ukraine’s finances are in such bad shape that it will have trouble paying its debts this year without outside help. With continuing deficits, it faces borrowing needs of between $7 billion and $10 billion this year. Its poor prospects mean it’s unlikely to be able to borrow more on bond markets.
On top of that, the central bank has been spending its dwindling foreign-currency reserves, which were down to $17.8 billion at the end of January, to prop up the exchange rate of the hryvnia currency. One reason it is doing so is that many businesses and consumers owe money in dollars and a sharp drop in the hryvnia could trigger widespread bankruptcies.
Unfortunately, keeping the currency artificially strong hurts exports.
Russia had promised $15 billion in loans and natural-gas discounts, an inducement to abandon closer ties with the EU and join a Russian-sponsored trade group. Even that money, however, seems to be on hold due to uncertainty about the fate of the government. Ratings agency Standard & Poor’s said Friday that Ukraine would likely default without a significant improvement in the political crisis.
Material from The New York Times is included in this report.