WASHINGTON — A group of leading House Republicans donned lab coats this week and took to a Capitol Hill news conference to plead for passage of a bill that would restore funding for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) amid the government shutdown.
“Whether it’s pediatric-cancer research, diabetes, so many other cures and treatments that are being developed — we don’t want to put them on hold,” Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Spokane, said Thursday. “We want America to continue to be the leader.”
Yet three days earlier, McMorris Rodgers joined other Republicans in deciding to shut down the NIH and other parts of the government after President Obama refused to curtail the Affordable Care Act.
McMorris Rodgers, who has a child with Down syndrome, “has always supported the critical medical research at NIH, especially because she has a personal connection to the difference it can make in the lives of millions of families and children with disabilities,” a spokesman said.
- A couple thoughts on Fred Jackson, Kam Chancellor and the Seahawks
- UW, Alaska Airlines agree to naming-rights deal for Husky Stadium's field
- Wife upset dad disappointed in baby's gender
- Haggen sues Albertsons for $1 billion over big grocery deal
- After McKinley, it’s time to consider renaming Rainier
Most Read Stories
In ways big and small, Republicans and Democrats are trying — and often struggling — to square their strategy for overcoming the government shutdown with their prior positions.
The challenge has been greatest for Republicans, who have refused to pass a funding bill unless it also defunds or delays the health-care law backed by Obama. Many Republicans spent the remainder of the week bemoaning programs that had been closed and trying to restore funding to individual agencies through piecemeal legislation.
Democrats, meanwhile, have been standing unified against the GOP strategy, refusing to play along to open agencies that they generally support. Dozens of Democrats have broken ranks, however, voting with Republicans in favor of restoring funding for the District of Columbia and for veterans programs.
The net effect is a sort of political cognitive dissonance: Republicans demand to reopen some agencies, but not the whole government, while Democrats oppose relief unless everything is restored.
Rep. Randy Neugebauer of Texas illustrated the risks of the GOP approach this week when he publicly railed against a National Park Service ranger working at the National World War II Memorial on the National Mall in Washington. The monument was closed when the government shut down.
In a moment captured on a widely viewed video, Neugebauer stood by a group of veterans and asked the ranger, “How do you look at them and deny them access?”
The ranger responded, “It’s difficult.” Then the congressman said: “The park service should be ashamed of themselves.” She replied, “I’m not ashamed.” One visitor at the memorial started to defend the ranger by shouting at Neugebauer, “This woman is doing her job,” and telling him to do his.
The congressman’s Facebook page was later inundated with critical messages, including some from the veterans he was aiming to support. A spokeswoman for Neugebauer did not respond to an email seeking comment.
Other Republican lawmakers have faced criticism for accepting salaries while federal workers aren’t getting paychecks.
Rep. Renee Ellmers of North Carolina, who supported the shutdown, told radio station WTVD in Raleigh, N.C., that she could not afford to give up her $174,000 salary.
“The thing of it is, I need my paycheck. That is the bottom line,” Ellmers said.
She faced immediate criticism from her home state. “We appreciate the fact that Rep. Ellmers is living paycheck to paycheck, like so many hardworking North Carolinians, making it all the more unfortunate that she refuses to earn her paycheck and work toward a common sense solution to end this self-inflicted crisis,” the state Democratic Party said in a statement.
On Friday, Ellmers said she would give up her compensation while the shutdown lasts to “stand with all federal workers.”
On restoring funding to the NIH, Republicans made emotional pleas after news reports that children with cancer were being turned away from clinical trials. The GOP has passed a bill in the House to restore funding to the NIH, but the Senate has refused to take it up as a one-off bill.
Wearing a lab coat at the Thursday news conference focused on the NIH, Rep. Todd Rokita, R-Ind., said: “Families, faith communities, associations and neighbors can take care of us better than government programs can.”
But he said there are areas where government is important, including NIH. He noted that his son has a rare neurological disorder that could benefit from NIH research.
“Without the help of programs that are at the NIH and other private-sector programs, we may never know,” he said.
Some public-health experts said it makes little sense to simply restore funding to specific programs.
“The NIH isn’t the only research institution in the government,” said Georges Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association. “There are many, many, many other health agencies that provide health services that are just as critical and just as important.”
Democrats have gone along with a few carve-outs to the shutdown, most notably agreeing to pay military salaries. But for the most part, they have refused to entertain bills to open war memorials, fund the NIH, fund the veterans department and take other steps to reopen specific federal functions.
The unified strategy has opened Democrats to criticism that they are brushing off the chance to lessen the closure’s negative effects.
Eleanor Holmes Norton, the District of Columbia’s nonvoting delegate to the House, gave an impassioned speech in the House imploring colleagues to restore funding for her region. And Sen. Bernard Sanders of Vermont, an independent who caucuses with Democrats, has argued in favor of a bill funding veterans programs.
But other Democrats say they must stand unified against what they have called GOP “gimmicks.”
“What right do they have to pick and choose what part of government’s going to be funded? It’s obvious what’s going on here,” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.