SIMFEROPOL, Ukraine — Two weeks ago, Sergei Aksyonov was a small-time Crimean politician, the leader of a tiny pro-Russia political party that could barely summon 4 percent of the votes in the last regional election.
He was a little-known businessman with a murky past and a nickname — “Goblin” — left over from the days when criminal gangs flourished here after the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Times have changed.
Today, Aksyonov is the prime minister of Crimea’s regional parliament and the public face of Russia’s seizure of the Black Sea peninsula.
- WWU cancels classes Tuesday after racial threats on social media
- Seahawks re-sign Bryce Brown in Marshawn Lynch’s absence
- Report: Seahawks’ Marshawn Lynch has surgery Wednesday, could be back by late December
- Like Marshawn Lynch, Seahawks’ Thomas Rawls craves contact
- Seahawks ramblings: What got Cary Williams benched?
Most Read Stories
He is, by all appearances, a man placed in power by Moscow who is now working hard to make Crimea a part of Russia.
He also leads a brand-new army, 30 men carrying AK-47s who are still learning to march in formation. “Commander!” they greeted him Saturday, when they were sworn into service in a Simferopol park.
Speaking at the ceremony, the former semiprofessional boxer said that while Crimea’s March 16 referendum would make the peninsula a part of Russia, he holds no grudge against Ukraine.
“We are not enemies with those soldiers who pledged loyalty to the Ukrainian state,” he said, referring to the soldiers now barricaded into bases across Crimea, unsure what will happen to them. They will be allowed to leave for Ukraine if they wish, he said. He is, he insisted, a peacemaker.
But the people of Simferopol remember Aksyonov by his 1990s name, “Goblin.”
“He wasn’t a criminal big shot,” said Andriy Senchenko, now a member of Ukraine’s Batkivshchyna party, which was at the forefront of the Kiev protests that led last month to the downfall of pro-Russia President Viktor Yanukovych. Senchenko described Aksyonov as a “brigade leader” in a gang that was often involved in extortion rackets.
While Senchenko is not unbiased — his party opposes Aksyonov’s push for Crimea to become part of Russia — the editor of the region’s main pro-Russian newspaper, Crimean Truth, also accused Aksyonov of being in a criminal gang. Mikhail Bakharev made the allegations five years ago, when Aksyonov first emerged on Crimea’s political scene.
Aksyonov, who denies the allegations, sued Bakharev for defamation and won, but a higher court later dismissed the case against the editor.
Today, with Aksyonov at the center of Crimean politics, and with the Russian soldiers who back him deployed across the peninsula, Bakharev now insists he was mistaken.
The stories about a criminal past “were just his enemies attacking him,” Bakharev said during an interview, shifting nervously and clearly unhappy to be discussing the topic. He said further investigations showed Aksyonov had no ties to criminal gangs.
He now counts himself as an ardent Aksyonov supporter, calling him “a confident and brave person who is not afraid to take responsibility.”
His critics say it’s clear Aksyonov is simply a puppet, someone installed by Moscow to ease what has become, in effect, a Russian takeover of its former territory.
“If six months ago someone would have told me that Aksyonov would become prime minister, I would have laughed,” said Valentina Tsamar, a prominent Simferopol journalist with the TV channel Chernomorskaya.
Local journalists say Aksyonov emerged on the political scene with the backing of Vladimir Konstantinov, the speaker of Crimea’s parliament and a prominent builder now embroiled in scandals over unpaid bank loans and failed construction projects. Konstantinov’s company, Konsul, collected money from Ukrainians to build homes but never finished the projects, according to reporters who have looked into the deals.
Official investigations, though, never apparently began.
Members of the parliament are immune from prosecution, and Konstantinov’s powerful ties to the now-ousted Ukrainian ruling party meant investigations could be easily stalled.
“He’s untouchable,” said Sergey Mokrushin, an investigative journalist with Chernomorskaya.
Aksyonov does have his supporters.
Gennady Ivanchenkov, a 56-year-old Simferopol economist, said he’s impressed with Aksyonov’s leadership in such a tumultuous time. As for Aksyonov’s past, he isn’t sure the “Goblin” stories are true, and even if they are he isn’t worried.
“Those pages of his life, they are not relevant,” he said. “You know, the ’90s were such dark times and now I can only judge him by what he’s doing now.”