China reversed its pledge to allow uncensored Internet access to foreign journalists covering the Olympics, dealing another blow to hopes that the Games would lead to political change.
BEIJING — The International Olympic Committee is not insisting that China allow fully unfettered access to the Internet for the thousands of journalists arriving here to cover the Olympics, despite promising repeatedly that the foreign news media could “report freely” during the games, Olympics officials acknowledged Wednesday.
Since the Olympic Village press center opened Friday, reporters have been unable to access scores of Web pages — among them those that discuss Tibetan issues, Taiwanese independence, the violent crackdown of the protests in Tiananmen Square and the Web sites of Amnesty International, the BBC’s Chinese language news, Radio Free Asia and several Hong Kong newspapers known for their freewheeling political discourse.
The restrictions, which closely resemble the blocks that China places on the Internet for its own citizens, undermine sweeping claims by Jacques Rogge, the IOC president, that China had agreed to provide free Web access for foreign news media during the games. Rogge has long argued that one of the main benefits of awarding the games to Beijing was that the event would make China more open.
“For the first time, foreign media will be able to report freely and publish their work freely in China. There will be no censorship on the Internet,” Rogge told Agence France-Presse just two weeks ago.
- Roads could be a mess this weekend — and Monday
- Hope Solo’s domestic-violence charges revived
- Tenants of run-down building: Owner said pay more or get out
- Parents of toddler killed in Bellevue to return to India
- Woman held on $1 million bail in death of West Seattle toddler
Most Read Stories
But a high-ranking Olympic committee official said Wednesday that the committee was aware that China would continue to censor Web sites carrying content that Chinese propaganda authorities deemed harmful to national security and social stability. The committee acquiesced to China’s demands to maintain such controls, said the official, who declined to be identified because he was not the designated public spokesman for the International Olympic Committee.
It was not immediately clear if China had provided special Internet links for overseas journalists working at the press center in the Olympic Village, or if officials feared that relaxing its regular controls might allow some of its own citizens to obtain information that was normally banned domestically.
In its negotiations with the Chinese over Internet controls, the official said, the Olympic committee insisted only that China provide unfettered access to sites containing information useful to sports reporters covering athletic competitions, not to a broader array of sites that the Chinese and the Olympic committee negotiators determined had little relevance to sports.
The official said he now believed that the Chinese defined their national security needs more broadly than the Olympic committee had anticipated, denying reporters access to some information that they might need to cover the events and the host country fully.
This week, foreign news media in China were unable directly to access an Amnesty International report that detailed what it called a deterioration in China’s human rights record in the prelude to the games.
“We are quite stunned by the decision but we will survive this mess,” the official said. Sandrine Tonge, the media relations coordinator for the committee, said the organization would press the Chinese authorities to reconsider the limits.
Chinese officials initially suggested that any troubles journalists were having with Internet access probably stemmed from the sites themselves, not any steps that China had taken to filter Web content. But Sun Weide, the chief spokesman for the Beijing Olympic organizing committee, acknowledged Wednesday that journalists would not have uncensored Internet use during the Games.
“It has been our policy to provide the media with convenient and sufficient access to the Internet,” said Sun. “I believe our policy will not affect reporters’ coverage of the Olympic games.”
The restrictions were the latest in a string of problems that have tarnished the prelude to the Olympics, which open Aug. 8. China struggled to contain an outbreak of ethnic unrest in Tibetan areas this spring. The global torch relay that China organized to promote the Games was disrupted by protests in several major cities. Air pollution in Beijing has remained severe despite efforts to restrict traffic and scale back factory production to reduce emissions.
In recent months, human rights advocates have accused Beijing of stepping up the detention and surveillance of those it fears could disrupt the games. On Tuesday, President Bush met with five Chinese dissidents at the White House to drive home his dissatisfaction with the pace of change. Bush, who leaves for the opening ceremonies in just over a week, also pressed China’s foreign minister to ease political repression.
The White House also urged China to lift its restrictions on the Internet.
“We want to see more access for reporters, we want to see more access for everybody in China to be able to have access to the Internet,” the White House press secretary, Dana Perino, said Wednesday. China has “nothing to fear” from Internet freedom, she said.
On Capitol Hill, Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., introduced a resolution on Tuesday urging China to reconsider what he said were its plans to force international hotel chains to track electronic communications by its guests. At a news conference, he introduced redacted documents that he said were provided by the hotels requiring them to install government software to monitor Internet traffic during the Olympics. Brownback said the hotels were worried they would be punished, or even lose vital operating licenses, for defying the orders.
Concerns about press access to the Internet intensified Tuesday, when Western journalists working at the Main Press Center in Beijing said they could not get to Amnesty International’s Web site to see the group’s report on China’s rights record.
T. Kumar, Amnesty International’s Asia advocacy director, said he thought the government was hoping it could dissuade reporters from pursuing stories about human rights issues by blocking their access to Internet-based information. “This sends the wrong message not only to journalists but to anyone on his or her way to the Olympics,” he said.
It was not clear how hard Olympic committee officials pushed for open access to the Internet during negotiations with the Chinese, which dated back to the decision to award Beijing the games in 2001, or why Rogge, the Olympic chief, promised that the news media would have uncensored access during the Games when officials working for him were aware that China would keep at least some of its censorship policies in place.
Kevan Gosper, press chief of the IOC, was quoted by Reuters on Wednesday as saying that IOC officials had agreed that China could block sites that would not hinder reporting on the Games themselves.
“I also now understand that some IOC official negotiated with the Chinese that some sensitive sites would be blocked on the basis they were not considered Games-related,” he told the news agency.
The senior Olympic committee official said the committee pressed hardest for unfiltered access to sites that sports reporters would need to cover athletic competitions. He said such sites included some that had been blocked in China in the past, including Wikipedia, but did not include political sites run by groups that the Beijing government considers hostile, like the spiritual sect Falun Gong.
Jonathan Watts, president of The Foreign Correspondents Club of China, said he was disappointed that Beijing had failed to honor its agreement to temporarily remove the elaborate firewall that prevented ordinary Chinese citizens from fully using the Internet. “Obviously if reporters can’t access all the sites they want to see, they can’t do their jobs,” he said. “Unfortunately such restrictions are normal for reporters in China but the Olympics were supposed to be different.”
ALSO: Beijing Olympic organizers said they were “disappointed” that rehearsals of the Aug. 8 opening ceremony were broadcast on South Korean television and were trying to find out how it happened.
Seoul Broadcasting System, South Korea’s third-largest broadcaster, two days ago ran a two-minute item including images of people practicing for the opening ceremony.
Details of the ceremony are one of the most closely guarded secrets in the Chinese capital, with those involved having to sign pledges of secrecy. Unlike in Athens at the 2004 Games, none of the rehearsals are open to reporters.