Signaling that the highly partisan battle over judges will continue next year, the White House announced yesterday that President Bush will renominate 20 unconfirmed judicial candidates...
WASHINGTON — Signaling that the highly partisan battle over judges will continue next year, the White House announced yesterday that President Bush will renominate 20 unconfirmed judicial candidates, including seven filibustered by Senate Democrats.
The unexpected holiday announcement disappointed Democrats and even dismayed moderate Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., the new chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Most Read Stories
- Seattle police spokesman plays video game while talking about fatal shooting of Charleena Lyles; video removed
- Veteran LAPD officer arrested for sex with 15-year-old cadet
- Did you get the letter? WSU sends warning to 1 million people after hard drive with personal info is stolen
- Issaquah student was doing 102 mph — and didn’t get a fine. Should fellow students be the judges?
- Road rage in Kent: Subaru strikes Jeep three times
“I would have preferred to have had some time in the 109th Congress to try to cool the climate to avoid a judicial gridlock and future filibusters,” said Specter, who nearly lost the chairmanship after comments that a Supreme Court nominee must back abortion rights. “But the president has a right to send over names, and I respect that. We will move ahead on his nominees with hearings and appropriate consideration.”
The president’s action sets the stage for a likely showdown over the filling of an expected vacancy on the Supreme Court and fuels speculation over whether Republicans will take the drastic step of changing Senate rules to ban filibusters on judicial nominees.
Although Republicans have expanded their Senate majority to 55, they still lack the 60 votes needed to end a filibuster, which Democrats have used to block 10 judicial nominees they consider unsuitable or too extreme.
A change that would require a simple majority of 51 votes to stop a filibuster has been dubbed the “nuclear option.” If exercised, Democrats have vowed to block Bush’s legislative agenda by using procedural delays and obstacles.
The names of three of the filibustered nominees were not resubmitted — Washington attorney Miguel Estrada and Mississippi Appellate Court Judge Charles Pickering withdrew their names, and Bush did not retap Carolyn Kuhl of California.
White House spokesman Scott McClellan complained the Senate failed to vote on many Bush nominations of “highly qualified individuals” to the courts and asserted it has “a constitutional obligation to vote up or down” on them.
Democrats dismissed that assertion as untrue and accused Bush of abandoning his postelection pledge of bipartisanship.
“The Bush administration is ending the year as they began it, choosing confrontation over compromise, ideology over moderation and defiance over cooperation,” said Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., the Judiciary Committee’s ranking Democrat.
Bruce Fein, a consultant on filibusters to Republicans, said Bush is “daring” Senate Democrats to filibuster again. “This looks like a dress rehearsal for ensuring a filibuster is not a weapon against a Supreme Court nominee,” he said.
With the illness of Chief Justice William Rehnquist, many say Bush will have one or more vacancies to fill on the Supreme Court.
“It’s a gratuitous slap in the face,” said Nan Aron, executive director of the liberal Alliance for Justice that has opposed many Bush nominees who are against abortion rights, federal regulation and traditional civil rights.